Search Results for "substantive offence"

2154 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2154 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Public Witness. Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The present criminal appeals were preferred by the appellants-accused under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction but Reduces Sentence in Rash and Negligent Driving Case. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304A IPC Maintained While Substantive Imprisonment Reduced to Period Already Served Based on Mitigating Circumstances Including Compensation Payment and Family Situation.

The Supreme Court considered a criminal appeal challenging conviction and sentence for offences under Sections 279 and 304A of the Indian Penal Code a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Application Challenging Condition of Deposit in Suspension of Sentence in NI Act Case — Appellate Court Cannot Impose Deposit Condition Under Section 357(2) CrPC for Suspension of Sentence

The applicant, Maheshwar Dattatraya Kale, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Pune, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case as Complaint Was Time-Barred Under Section 142(b) of NI Act. Failure to File Condonation Application for Limitation Despite Objection at Trial Renders Acquittal Proper.

The appeal before the Karnataka High Court arose out of a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, alleging dishonour of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Kerala Forest Act Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Statutory Interpretation. Sandalwood Oil Not Classified as Forest Produce Under Section 2(f), and Prosecution Failed to Prove Illicit Removal from Reserve Forest as Required Under Section 27(1)(d).

The appeal arose from a criminal conviction under the Kerala Forest Act, 1961, involving the appellant, a partner in a firm manufacturing and trading ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Railway Robbery and Assault Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 392, 332, 353, 323, 504, 506-II IPC and Section 153 Railways Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Kumar Ramu Rathod, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, in Sessions Case No. 625 of 2017 for offences under ...