Bombay High Court Modifies Conviction from Dacoity to Robbery with Hurt in Appeal Against Sessions Court Judgment. Appellant Convicted Under Section 394 IPC Instead of Sections 395 and 397 IPC as Prosecution Failed to Prove Presence of Five Persons for Dacoity.
29 Aug 2006The appellant, Balu Pandharinath Takle, was one of four accused charged with dacoity under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for al...




