Search Results for "production before judicial officer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "production before judicial officer"

1667 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1667 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in POCSO Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 35(1) of POCSO Act — Mandatory Recording of Child Victim's Evidence Within 30 Days Not Followed. The court held that the omission to record the child victim's evidence within the statutory period entitles the accused to bail.

13 Jul 2017

The petitioner, Vinay, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail in Crime No.194/2015 register...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Stay on Interest Demand in MVAT Case — Tribunal Erred in Treating Composite Order as Non-Appealable Under Section 30(2). The court held that an appellate order confirming interest under Section 30(2) of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, when part of a composite assessment order, is appealable and stay can be granted.

6 Jun 2023

The petitioner, S. K. Trading Co., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 30 Septemb...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Reviews Conviction Under Section 302 IPC in Wife Murder Case. Appeal Challenges Conviction Relying on Circumstantial Evidence of Motive, Recovery, and Phone Calls.

25 Sep 2020

The appellant, Rupesh Radhakisan Chaudhari, was convicted by the trial court for the murder of his wife, Jaishree, under Section 302 of the Indian Pen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaint Against Company Directors Due to Section 195(1)(b)(i) CrPC Bar. Allegations of Filing False Affidavits and Documents in Court Proceedings Required Court's Written Complaint, Not Private Complaint Under Section 156(3).

16 Aug 2018

The dispute arose from a criminal complaint filed by Shree Hari Rice & Agro Ltd. (respondent no.1) against M/s Lan Eseda Industries Ltd. (petitioner) ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Award Against NAFED in Groundnut Export Dispute — Government Refusal Does Not Excuse Breach Under FOSFA Contract. The court held that a canalizing agency cannot rely on its own lack of permission as a force majeure event under Clause 14 of the FOSFA 20 Contract, and enforcement of the award is not against public policy despite procedural irregularities.

22 Apr 2020

The case involves a dispute between National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India (NAFED), a canalizing agency for the Government of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Declines to Answer Reference on Academic Issue When Underlying Writ Petition Disposed of. Full Bench holds that a larger bench cannot answer a reference for academic purposes when the cause is not live.

21 Jan 2021

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur was constituted to resolve a conflict of opinion between two Division Bench decisions: Saroj Iyer v....

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Decree-Holder's Petition Under Article 227 in Execution Proceedings — Order XXI Rule 41 CPC Mandates Judgment-Debtor to File Affidavit of Assets. The Court held that the Commercial Court erred in dismissing the application for asset disclosure without considering the mandatory nature of Order XXI Rule 41 CPC.

30 Jul 2025

The petitioner, Ms. Sumita Abhishek Sundaram, is the decree-holder in a commercial execution proceeding (Com. Ex. 541 of 2024) pending before the LXXX...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Surety's Appeal Against Forfeiture of Bond Amount — Reduces Penalty from Rs.40,000 to Rs.5,000. Surety's inability to produce absconding accused does not warrant forfeiture of entire bond amount under Section 446(3) CrPC.

31 Mar 2021

The appellant, Sri Muniyappa, was a surety for accused Nos.1 and 3 in Sessions Case No.56/2016 before the II Additional District & Sessions Judge, Tum...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Government Order Appointing Administrator for Vyasaraja Mutt. Petitioners Allege That the Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997 Does Not Apply to the Mutt and Seek Quashing of the Administrator's Appointment.

2 Jan 2013

The case involved two writ petitions filed in the High Court of Karnataka challenging the Government orders dated 26.05.2012 appointing an administrat...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Against BWSSB for Unauthorised Laying of Sewer Pipelines in Private Lands Without Acquisition. Petitioners Challenge Section 77 as Unconstitutional and Seek Compensation for Violation of Right to Property Under Article 300A.

1 Jun 2026

...

52 53 54 55 56

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)