Search Results for "muddemal"

902 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 902 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by five accused persons against their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Manikrao Salunke, was a Naib Tahsildar in Omerga, Osmanabad district. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Osmanabad, for offences un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction and life imprisonment of the appellants under Sections 302 and 323 read with Section 34 of the I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Wasudeo s/o Madhukar Khadatkar, was convicted by the trial court for the murder of Naresh Mankar under Section 302 of the Indian Penal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Father in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration — Conviction Under Sections 376, 354, 323, 506 IPC Set Aside. Incestuous Rape Allegation Fails as Prosecutrix's Evidence is Unreliable and Contradictory, Benefit of Doubt Given to Appellant.

The appellant, Balu Bhausaheb Kothule, was convicted by the Sessions Court for offences under Sections 376, 354, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Grievous Hurt Case. Cousins convicted under Section 326 read with Section 34 IPC for attacking victims with dangerous weapons, sentence of 7 years rigorous imprisonment confirmed.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under Section 326 read with Section 34 IPC. The appellants, Ramesh, Gopal, and Eknath Mahajan, were con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Deceased Identified Through Tattoo Marks; Last Seen Theory and Motive Established.

The appellant, Uddhav @ Madhukar Ramchandra Jadhav, was convicted by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon, for the murder of Gaman Dashrath Paw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in NDPS Case for Possession of 3 kg Heroin — Ten Years' RI and Fine of Rs. 1 Lakh Maintained. Search of Bag Not Personal Search, Hence Section 50 NDPS Act Not Applicable.

The appellant, Vinod Ramchandra Dhakad, was convicted by the learned Special Judge, NDPS Cases, Mumbai, in NDPS Special Case No. 107/2004 for an offen...