Search Results for "deed interpretation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "deed interpretation"

1575 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1575 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Modifies Compensation Rate in Land Dispute Under Compromise Decree — Guideline Value Under Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 Fixed at Rs. 750 per Square Foot. Court Holds That Executing Court Erred in Applying Subsequent Notification and High Court's Reduction Was Unwarranted, Directs Payment of Average Guideline Value.

30 Apr 2026

The case involves a dispute between Appellants (N.I.C.E.) and the decree holders, Respondents, arising from a compromise decree in a suit for permanen...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

1 Jan 1970

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Purchaser in Scheduled Caste Land Transfer Dispute — Migrant Scheduled Caste Status Cannot Be Claimed in Another State for Land Transactions Under Rajasthan Tenancy Act and Colonization Act. The Court held that a person recognized as Scheduled Caste in Punjab cannot claim the same status in Rajasthan for purchasing land from a Scheduled Caste allottee, and compounding under Section 13A does not validate the void transfer.

20 Oct 2021

The dispute pertains to agricultural land in Rajasthan originally allotted to Chunilal, a Scheduled Caste person. In 1972, Chunilal borrowed Rs.5000 f...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in U.P. Gangsters Act Case — Quashes FIR for Lack of Anti-Social Activity. Property Disputes of Civil Nature Cannot Be Basis for Prosecution Under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986.

10 Feb 2025

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Jay Kishan and others against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, challenging the dismissal of their ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Dispute Involving Scheduled Caste Status and Statutory Violations. The court held that Scheduled Caste status is state-specific under the Constitution and cannot be claimed by a migrant in another state, and the land transaction was void as it violated Section 42 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 and Section 13 of the Rajasthan Colonization Act, 1954.

5 Jan 2022

The dispute centered on land in Rajasthan originally allotted to Chunilal, a Scheduled Caste person, who allegedly borrowed money from Puran Singh, a ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Subsequent Purchaser Cannot Invoke Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act. The Court held that a person who purchases land after the acquisition process is complete has no locus standi to claim lapse of acquisition under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

18 May 2023

The case involves an appeal by the Government of NCT of Delhi against an order of the High Court of Delhi allowing a writ petition filed by the respon...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assignees' Claim in Execution Proceedings Under Order XXI Rule 16 CPC Based on Pre-Decree Assignment. The Explanation to Order XXI Rule 16, inserted by the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1976, permits transferees of property rights to apply for execution without separate assignment, making the application under Section 47 CPC maintainable for adjudication of assignee rights.

21 Oct 2021

The dispute arose from a contract awarded by the Union of India to Surendra Nath Kanungo for extension work at Port Blair Airport. Kanungo assigned th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Order on Jurisdiction in Arbitration Claim Petition. Court holds that Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 provides a remedy against an arbitral award, not an interlocutory order, and that the petition is premature.

4 Sep 2025

The petitioner, a cooperative housing society, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 14th Ma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Non-Compliance with DCR 2018 — Held that Construction Approved Prior to DCR 2018 is Not Subject to New FSI Restrictions. Vested rights of the petitioners were upheld as the building was substantially completed before the new regulations came into force.

26 Sep 2023

The petitioners, Sai Chintan C.H.S.LTD. and MPR Builders and Developers LLP, filed a writ petition challenging a demolition notice dated 20.12.2022 is...

52 53 54 55 56

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)