Search Results for "conduct"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "conduct"

13844 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 13844 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand of Dowry Soon Before Death. Conviction under Section 304-B IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish that the deceased was subjected to cruelty or harassment in connection with dowry demand shortly before her death.

23 Feb 2026

The appellant, Tamizhmani, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Mahalir Neethimandram (Fast Track Mahila Court), Villupuram, for offences under Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition Challenging Eviction for Nuisance Under Bombay Rent Act. Concurrent Findings of Fact on Nuisance Under Section 13(1)(c) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 Upheld.

4 Jul 2017

The petitioner, original defendant Suklal Kalu Thorat (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), filed a writ petition challenging the judgment dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Inconsistent Medical Evidence. Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 302, 307, 452, 504, 506, 143, 147, 148, 149 of IPC.

1 Aug 2017

The appellant, Abdul Rauf Abdul Razzak, filed an appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 17-11-2008 passed by the learned Ad-hoc Addi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds That Boycott of Courts by Lawyers for Demand of Bench at Pune/Kolhapur Constitutes Criminal Contempt. The Court ruled that abstention from court work and calls for boycott by Bar Associations to pressurize the government for establishment of a bench amounts to interference with the administration of justice and is criminal contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

15 Sep 2017

The judgment arises from a suo moto criminal contempt petition initiated by the Bombay High Court and a connected writ petition filed by Manoj Oswal. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Criminal Contempt Petition Against Advocate for Alleged Misconduct in Execution Proceedings — No Prima Facie Case of Contempt Made Out. Court Held That Filing of Applications and Alleged Misstatements by Advocate Did Not Constitute Willful Disobedience or Scandalizing the Court Under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

24 Sep 2018

The present reference was made by Miss Huma A. Ansari, the then 3rd Joint Civil Judge Junior Division and J.M.F.C., Aurangabad (the Presiding Officer)...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Petitions of APMC Committee Members Challenging Government Circular Curtailing Term. Section 7(2) of Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966 mandates continuation of committee until newly elected committee assumes office, overriding executive instructions.

13 Jun 2016

The petitioners, members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee, challenged a Government Circular dated 22-04-2016 that purported to ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Appointment of Administrator for APMC Committee — Appointment of Administrator Without Prior Notice and Without Considering Representation Violates Principles of Natural Justice. The court held that the power under Section 121 of the Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966 must be exercised in accordance with natural justice, and failure to issue show cause notice renders the appointment invalid.

13 Jun 2016

The petitioners, who were the President, Vice President, and members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC), challenged the ap...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds Validity of APMC Bye-Laws Requiring Traders to Obtain Licenses and Pay Market Fees — Held that Bye-Laws Framed Under Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1966 Are Statutory and Binding. Writ petitions challenging bye-laws dismissed as not maintainable without challenging the parent Act.

13 Jun 2016

The petitioners, who are members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee, filed writ petitions challenging the validity of certain bye...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Petitions of APMC Members Challenging Government Circular on Term of Committee — Statutory Rule Under Rule 14(4) of KAPM(R&D) Rules, 1968 Prevails. The court held that the term of the committee continues until the first meeting of the newly constituted committee, and a government circular cannot override the statutory rule.

13 Jun 2016

The case involved a batch of writ petitions filed by members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC) challenging a government c...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Tribunal's Order Upheld for Lack of Substantial Question of Law. Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for alleged concealment of income was deleted by the Tribunal on finding no deliberate concealment.

11 Sep 2013

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribu...

52 53 54 55 56

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)