Search Results for "commercial execution"

2009 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2009 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Termination of Contract in Municipal Tender Dispute — Unilateral Termination Without Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice. Contract Termination Set Aside as Arbitrary and Unreasonable Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, K.I.P.L. Vistacore Infra Projects J.V., a partnership firm, was awarded a contract by the Ichalkaranjee Municipal Council for a projec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Execution of Compromise Decree in Specific Performance Suit — Jurisdiction Objection Waived by Consent Decree. Clause 22 of Agreement Conferring Jurisdiction on Pune Courts Held Binding Despite Property Location in Satara.

The applicant, M/s. Indrayani Foods Ltd., entered into an agreement to sell two properties in Satara district to the respondent, PamPac Machines Pvt. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Decides Regular First Appeal Arising from Dismissal of Suit for Declaration of Property Ownership. Property Originally Allotted to a Swamiji Under Mysore Government Scheme and Later Subject to Litigation Over Inheritance and Alleged Fraud.

The appeal arose from the dismissal of a suit for declaration of ownership of immovable property situated in Bangalore. The original plaintiff, C.R. H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Hears Appeal and Cross-Objections Against Dismissal of Declaration Suit. Suit Filed by Brother of Deceased Religious Head for Declaration of Ownership of Property Allotted in 1952, Dismissed by Trial Court.

This Regular First Appeal and cross-objections arise from the judgment and decree dated 9 September 2005 passed by the Principal City Civil and Sessio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Group of Companies Doctrine to Larger Bench in Arbitration Dispute Over Software Agreement. Questions validity of applying the doctrine to bind non-signatory parent company to arbitration under Sections 8, 11, 35, and 45 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Cox & Kings Ltd., filed a petition under Section 11(6) read with Section 11(12)(a) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, seekin...