Search Results for "chief minister interference"

651 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 651 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Due to Gross Delay and Laches. Petitioner's failure to establish tenancy and inordinate delay in challenging notifications under Land Acquisition Act bars relief.

The petitioner, Vinayak Bhaskar Sinai Dhume, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging notifications dated 7th April 1999 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Disposes of Appeals and Revision in Kidnapping and Murder Case. Conviction under Sections 364-A, 302, 201, 120-B of IPC and Section 8 of Goa Children's Act, 2003, was Challenged by Accused, and State Appealed Against Set-Off under Section 428 CrPC.

The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard together five criminal appeals and one criminal revision application arising from the judgment and order dated 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MIDC Plot Allotments — No Arbitrariness Found in Allotment Process. Petitioner's claim for allotment based on alleged earmarking fails as no legal right established.

The petitioner, Vikrant Industries, a sole proprietorship, filed a writ petition under Articles 226, 14, and 19 of the Constitution of India challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeal in Service Matter - Appellant Permitted to Make Representation to Competent Authority. Single Judge's Order Not Interfered With as Appellant Can Still Pursue Remedy by Representation.

The appellant, Mr. M. Manju Prasad, filed a writ petition (W.P. No. 17537/2022) before the High Court of Karnataka seeking directions to the responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Notification for President Posts in District Consumer Forums Due to Lack of Consultation with High Court. Appointment Process Under Section 10 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Requires Prior Consultation with High Court Chief Justice.

The petitioners, three advocates, challenged a notification dated 23.04.2012 issued by the Under Secretary, Department of Food & Civil Supplies and Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Metro Fare Hike; Judicial Review Not Permitted Over Specialist Committee's Decision Under Metro Act. Fare Fixation Committee's Determination Based on Section 34 Prevails Over Contractual Fare Stipulations, Limited to Checking Arbitrariness or Perversity.

The writ petition challenged the Fare Fixation Committee's decision to increase Mumbai Metro fares from Rs.9-13 to Rs.10-110 from January 2015. The pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Factional Riot Murder Case — Acquittals Set Aside. Common Intention Under Section 149 IPC Applied to Convict All Members of Unlawful Assembly for Murder and Attempt to Murder.

The case arises from a violent incident on 13.06.2014 at Nava Borbhatha, Ankleshwar, where a group of accused persons, armed with deadly weapons, atta...