Search Results for "agreement purchaser"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "agreement purchaser"

1816 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1816 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Electricity Dues Dispute — Transferee Not Liable for Predecessor's Arrears Beyond Six Months Under MERC Regulations 2005. The court held that under Regulation 10.5 of the MERC (Electricity Supply Code and Other Conditions of Supply) Regulations, 2005, a transferee is liable only for six months of unpaid electricity charges, not the entire arrears.

16 Sep 2011

The petitioner, M/s. Namco Industries Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Maharashtra St...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Temporary Injunction in Favor of Plaintiff in Suit for Declaration of Title and Possession. The court found that the plaintiff had made out a prima facie case and that the balance of convenience was in his favor, restraining the bank from evicting him pending suit.

18 Mar 2005

The appeal arises from a suit filed by the respondent No.1 (original plaintiff) against the appellant (original defendant No.1) and respondent Nos.2 a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Restoration Application in Loan Default Case — Petitioner Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance. The court upheld the trial court's order rejecting restoration of a suit dismissed in default, as the petitioner's explanation of pursuing a One Time Settlement was unsupported and the suit had been pending for years without progress.

6 Dec 2013

The petitioner, M/s Delux Plastic Industries, through its proprietor Mohd. Ejaz Mohd. Riyaz, had taken a loan of Rs.6,80,000/- from the respondent, Ma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Court held that no substantial question of law arose for interference under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

30 Nov -0001

The case is a second appeal arising from a suit for partition and separate possession filed by the original plaintiffs (respondents) against the origi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case — Defendant's Logo Held Deceptively Similar to Plaintiff's Registered Logo. Well-known mark entitled to protection across classes under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

30 Jun 2016

The Plaintiff, Reliance Industries Ltd., filed a suit seeking injunctive reliefs against the Defendant, Concord Enviro Systems Pvt. Ltd., alleging inf...

High Court

Subsequent Purchaser Cannot Challenge Land Acquisition After Preliminary Notification – Karnataka High Court | Arkavathi Layout Case

20 Jan 2026

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order/report dated 23.02.2023 passed by t...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition of Industrial Undertaking Challenging Rejection of Section 63AA Certificate for Agricultural Land Purchase. Section 63AA of Gujarat Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, is a self-contained provision that does not require prior permission under Section 63 for purchase of agricultural land by an industrial undertaking for non-agricultural purposes.

13 Feb 2026

The petitioner, Mewad Polymers Private Limited, an industrial undertaking, purchased agricultural land situated at Revenue Survey No. 80/p3, Village-F...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order Allowing Impleadment in Regular Appeal — Assignment of Decree Without Court Permission Invalid Under Order 22 Rule 10 CPC. The court held that any assignment or creation of interest pendente lite requires prior permission of the court under Order 22 Rule 10 CPC, and without such permission, the assignee cannot be impleaded as a party.

23 Jun 2026

The petitioners, who were plaintiffs No.2 to 6 in a suit, filed a Regular Appeal (R.A.No.31/2022) before the Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM at R...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order Allowing Impleadment in Regular Appeal — Assignment of Decree Not Proved as Required Under Order 22 Rule 10 CPC. The court held that an application under Order 22 Rule 10 CPC for impleadment based on assignment of a decree must be supported by proper proof of the assignment deed, including examination of attesting witnesses and opportunity for cross-examination.

23 Jun 2026

The petitioners, who are plaintiffs in a regular appeal (R.A.No.31/2022) pending before the Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM at Ramanagara, challe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Indemnity Claim for Loss of Ownership Despite Continued Possession. Indemnity Bond Enforceable When Purchaser's Title Defeated by Creditor's Sale, Even Without Dispossession.

16 Feb 1966

The dispute arose from a sale of land by a father (second defendant) of property belonging to himself and his minor son (third defendant). To protect ...

52 53 54 55 56

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)