Search Results for "Writ jurisdiction Article 227"

3567 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3567 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Disposes Writ Petitions Challenging Reservation and Voter List for Mayor Elections. Court Relies on Principle that Election Process Should Not Be Stalled by Judicial Intervention Absent Grave Illegality.

These writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners we...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Refuses to Interfere in Municipal Election Process Amid Challenge to Reservation and Voter List. Pre-Election Judicial Intervention Not Permissible Under Article 243-ZG; Petitioners Allowed to Question Election Outcome After Declaration of Results.

The High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, considered three writ petitions challenging notifications regarding reservation of posts for Mayor and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Grant of Default Bail Under UAPA — Right to Default Bail Accrues on Expiry of 90 Days from First Remand, Subsequent Filing of Charge Sheet Does Not Defeat Right.

The Union of India filed writ appeals against an order of a learned Single Judge granting default bail to the respondents under Section 167(2) of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Deficit Stamp Duty Demand on Development Agreement — Agreement Not a Conveyance Under Bombay Stamp Act, 1958. Development Agreement Held Chargeable Under Article 5(ga) at 1% of Consideration, Not Market Value.

The petitioner, M/s. Prasun Developers, challenged orders of the Joint District Registrar and Collector of Stamps, Pune, and the Deputy Inspector Gene...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order as Time-Barred Under Section 17(1) of SARFAESI Act. Limitation Period of 45 Days for Filing Securitisation Application is Mandatory and Cannot Be Extended by the Tribunal.

The petitioner, M/s. Zen Lifecare Ltd., challenged the orders of the Debt Recovery Tribunal-I, Ahmedabad, dated 20th November 2020 and 6th February 20...