Search Results for "Share"

5627 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5627 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Decree of Specific Performance in Development Rights Dispute. Agreement for Sale of Development Rights Held Enforceable and Not Barred by Limitation or Registration Requirements.

The case involves a commercial appeal arising from a suit for specific performance of an agreement dated 10th March, 2003. The appellant, Samir Narain...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Partition Suit, Sets Aside Trial Court Decree Dismissing Suit as Not Maintainable. Father Cannot Execute Will Over Ancestral Property to Defeat Son's Right by Birth Under Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

The appellant/plaintiff, Karthikeyan, filed a suit for partition seeking a ½ share in the suit properties, claiming they were ancestral coparcenary p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Decree for Partition and Separate Possession. Will dated 27-05-1985 held not binding on plaintiff as it was not proved to be the last will of the testator.

The present appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 06-12-2013 passed by the XXVIII Additional City Civil Judge at Mayo Hall Unit, Bangalore, i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Partition Appeal, Remands Suit for Fresh Consideration on Issue of Joint Family Property. The trial court's decree was set aside due to improper appreciation of evidence and failure to frame proper issues regarding the nature of the suit properties.

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 30.11.2006 passed by the Principal Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Dharwad, in O.S.No.242/2003, decreeing the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court upholds trial and first appellate court decrees regarding declaration of title and injunction, finding no substantial question of law under Section 100 CPC.

The case is a Regular Second Appeal (RSA No.1858/2012) filed by the appellants (plaintiffs in the original suit) against the respondents (defendants) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal: Capital Gains Excluded from Dividend Under Section 2(6A) of Income-tax Act, 1922. Assessee's Share of Dividend Derived from Capital Gains Held Not Taxable as Dividend Due to Express Exclusion in the Proviso to Explanation to Section 2(6A)(a).

The case involved assessment year 1949-50 where respondent shareholders received dividends from a company and claimed that the portion distributed out...