Search Results for "Section 363"

874 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 874 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Evaluates State Appeal Against Acquittal of 17 Accused in Murder and Conspiracy Case. Trial Court Acquitted Accused of Charges Under Sections 143, 147, 148, 323, 324, 302, 201, 114 r/w 149 IPC Citing Insufficient Evidence.

The case arose from the alleged murder of Madhusudan Reddy on 27.05.2010 in Chitradurga. The prosecution claimed that due to previous enmity, 17 accus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Restitution to Judgment Debtor Under Section 144 CPC When Decree Varied and Decree Holder Purchased Property in Auction. Auction Sale Set Aside Due to Variation of Decree and Lack of Bona Fide Purchaser Status.

The appeal arose from a restitution application under Section 144 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC). The original plaintiff (decree holder) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Victim Testimony. Victim's Admission of Voluntary Association and Contradictions in Evidence Lead to Benefit of Doubt Under Section 366 IPC and Section 5(1) r/w Section 6 of POCSO Act.

The appellant, Popat Navasu Bendkoli, was convicted by the Special Judge (POCSO), Nashik, for offences under Section 366 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision That Nasik Math Not Registerable Under Bombay Public Trusts Act Due to Lack of Public Worship. Definition of 'Math' Under Section 2(9) Requires Religious Instruction and Spiritual Service, Which Were Absent in the Nasik Branch.

The case concerned the applicability of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 to a branch Math of the Shringeri Math situated at Nasik. The Assistant Cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition Challenging Lok Sabha Election of Nitin Gadkari for Non-Disclosure of Cause of Action. Petition under Section 80 read with Section 100(1)(d)(iv) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 fails as material facts not pleaded.

The petitioner, Manohar @ Sagar Pundlik Dabrase, filed an election petition under Section 80 read with Section 100(1) of the Representation of the Peo...