Search Results for "Section 100 Companies Act 2013"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Section 100 Companies Act 2013"

953 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 953 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in MSME Arbitration Execution Dispute, Upholding High Court's Ruling on Nullity Plea and Jurisdiction. Arbitral Award Remains Executable Despite Insolvency Resolution Plan Approving Claim at Nil, as Facilitation Council's Jurisdiction Not Extinguished Under Section 31 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

21 Apr 2025

The appeal arose from a dispute under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (MSME Act), where the respondent filed claim petit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Attachment Notices Against Third-Party Purchaser for Excise Dues of Defaulter. Central Excise Cannot Attach Property Sold Prior to Creation of Dues Without Notice to Purchaser Under Section 11 of Central Excise Act, 1944.

22 Apr 2021

The Petitioner, M/s Runwal Constructions, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, engaged in construction and developmen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Enforcement of RERA Order and Grants Interim Relief of Deposit and Injunction Against Developer. RERA Order Directing Refund of Investment with Interest Must Be Complied With by Revenue Authorities and Developer.

15 Jul 2021

The petitioner, Rustam Phiroze Mehta, filed a writ petition seeking enforcement of an order dated 15th April 2019 passed by the Maharashtra Real Estat...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIRs Against Former Chief Minister in BDA Denotification Case — CAG Report Cannot Be Sole Basis for Criminal Prosecution Without Independent Investigation. The court held that the CAG report is not a conclusive proof of criminality and cannot be the foundation for criminal prosecution without independent investigation, and that the FIRs were registered without proper sanction under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

5 Jan 2016

The petitioner, Shri B.S. Yeddyurappa, a former Chief Minister of Karnataka, filed multiple writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitut...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Service Tax on Renting of Immovable Property for Warehousing and Storage. Levy of Service Tax Under Section 65(105)(zzzz) of Finance Act, 1994 on Renting of Immovable Property for Commercial Use is Valid and Constitutional.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, including Tulsidas Khimji Warehousing Pvt. Ltd. and others, filed writ petitions challenging the levy of service tax on renting of im...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ of Prohibition Against Securitization Application Under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act — Petitioner Failed to Establish Lack of Jurisdiction as Respondent Was a Secured Creditor Under Section 2(1)(zd) of the Act. The court held that the challenge to the maintainability of the application under Section 14 was premature and that the petitioner could raise all contentions before the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate.

21 Feb 2025

The petitioner, M/s. Pyramid Developers, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, filed a writ petition under Articles 22...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PCIT's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order Under Section 245D(4) of Income Tax Act — No Jurisdictional Error Found. The court held that the Settlement Commission's order under Section 245D(4) is quasi-judicial and can only be challenged on limited grounds, and the PCIT failed to establish any jurisdictional error or perversity.

18 Apr 2024

The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-3, Mumbai filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Entertainment Duty on Award Function with Intermittent Performances. Sponsorship Amount for Invitee-Only Event Constitutes Payment for Admission Under Maharashtra Entertainments Duty Act.

20 Jun 2024

The petitioner, a company incorporated under Section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956, organized the 'APSARA' award function on 21st January 2006 at Jams...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Petition Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Family MoU Binding on Shareholders. The court held that a family Memorandum of Understanding containing an arbitration clause constitutes a valid arbitration agreement, enforceable under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and binding on heirs and successors.

6 Apr 2021

The appeal arose from the dismissal of a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed before the High Court of Delhi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Competing Claims Over Water Allocation from Upper Wardha Dam and Considers Constitutional Validity of Article 371(2) Governor’s Directives. Court Directs Interim Water Supply for 2012-13 and Frames Issues on Legality of Allocation and Binding Nature of Directives but Final Decision Not Contained in Available Text.

2 Mar 2013

The dispute arose from the allocation of 87.60 million cubic meters (MCM) of water from the Upper Wardha Dam in Amravati district, Maharashtra, to a t...

52 53 54 55 56

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)