Search Results for "Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes"

1551 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1551 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Examines Review Petition Against Order Directing Appointment of Teacher; Emphasizes Limited Scope of Review. Management Argued Error Apparent on Record as Teacher Allegedly Not Full-Time and Post Reserved, but Court Recalls Review Not Appeal and Error Must Be Self-Evident.

The review application arose from a writ petition filed by a teacher seeking regularization as Lecturer in English. The High Court had earlier allowed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Reserved Category Judicial Officers Challenging High Court Order Quashing Gradation List Based on Roster Points. Seniority for Promotion of Munsiffs Must Be Based on Merit, Not Reservation Roster, as Per Bimlesh Tanwar.

The case involves a dispute over the fixation of seniority of Munsiffs (Batch of 2003) for promotion to the post of Sub-Judge in the State of Jammu & ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Deletion of NRI Quota in PG Medical Admissions in Rajasthan. Change in Seat Matrix by State Counselling Board Held Valid as Colleges Failed to Provide NRI Seat Details and No Candidate Had Vested Right to Specific Quota.

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of appeals arising from a judgment of the Rajasthan High Court which had set aside a Single Judge's order dir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Caste Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating Caste Claim Due to Bias — Member Who Conducted Vigilance Cannot Sit on Committee. The Court held that participation of a vigilance officer as a member of the scrutiny committee violates natural justice and renders the order a nullity.

The petitioners, Kum. Shruti Nivarutti Hainalkar and Master Shravan Nivarutti Hainalkar (minors through their mother), challenged an order dated 9 Dec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Murder and Atrocities Case Due to High Court's Perfunctory Consideration of Evidence. Bail Orders Set Aside as High Court Failed to Evaluate Gravity of Offences Under Section 302 IPC and SC/ST Act, Ignoring Eyewitness Accounts and CCTV Footage.

The Supreme Court heard appeals filed by the original complainant against the High Court of Gujarat's orders granting bail to two accused persons in a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge-3, Beed, in Sessions Case No.40/2011, dated 10.10.2011...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes FIR Against BSNL Officers in SC/ST Act Case — No Intent to Humiliate or Insult Complainant. Adverse remarks made by superior officers in official capacity do not attract Section 3(1)(ix) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 or Section 167 IPC.

The judgment concerns two criminal writ petitions filed by officers of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL) seeking quashing of FIR No. 98/2017 registe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge Against Revenue Minister's Order Setting Aside Restoration of Land to Tenant. Delay of 34 Years in Filing Appeal Not Sufficiently Explained, Condonation Order Set Aside.

The petitioner, Debashish Devnarayan Ghosh, filed two writ petitions challenging orders passed by the Revenue Minister of Maharashtra and the Addition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in SC/ST Act Case — Rent Dispute Not Caste-Based. Allegations of Abusive Language Without Caste Reference Do Not Attract Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of SC/ST (POA) Amendment Act, 2015.

The petitioners, owners of a flat in Bangalore, entered into a rental agreement with the second respondent-complainant on 21.06.2018. A dispute arose ...