Search Results for "Punjab Industrial Tribunal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Punjab Industrial Tribunal"

602 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 602 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Articles of Charges Against KSRTC Employees for Lack of Power to Lay Traps Under Security Standing Orders. The court held that the Security Standing Orders do not authorize the laying of traps, rendering the disciplinary proceedings without jurisdiction.

30 Jun 2015

The petitioners, employees of the Karnataka Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC) and Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corporation (BMTC), challenged the...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Decides Writ Petition No. 2727 of 2018 Filed by Ruler of Ex-State of Jawahar Against State of Maharashtra and Others — [Details of Subject Matter and Outcome Not Available from Provided Text]

26 May 2025

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal of Principal Employer Under Employees Compensation Act, Upholding Joint and Several Liability for Death of Contract Worker. Court Applies Section 12 of Employees Compensation Act, 1923 to Hold Principal Employer KPTCL Liable Along with Contractor, Emphasizing Statutory Protection to Workmen.

30 Jan 2025

The dispute arose from the death of Udachappa, a coolie engaged by Larsen and Toubro Limited (respondent No.3), who was electrocuted on 05.05.2004 whi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for BAPS Temple Construction — Acquisition Upheld as Valid Public Purpose Under MRTP Act, 1966. Petitioners lacked locus standi and filed petition after 10-year delay, leading to dismissal.

11 Apr 2023

The petitioners, Mr. Salim Naim Khan and Mrs. Reshma Salim Khan, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of land by the State of Maharashtra...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Interim Order in SARFAESI Act Case as Writ Petition Against Private Asset Reconstruction Company Not Maintainable. The Court held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India does not lie against a private ARC, and the proper remedy is an appeal under Section 17 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act, 2002.

12 Jan 2022

The dispute arose from writ petitions filed by borrowers, Vishwa Bharati Vidya Mandir and St. Ann's Education Society, against Phoenix ARC Private Lim...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Possession of Auctioned Property — Bank Not Obligated to Deliver Vacant Possession Under SARFAESI Act. SARFAESI Act, 2002 Section 13(4) and Section 17 — Auction Sale Confirmed in Favor of Petitioner, but Bank Delivered Only Symbolic Possession; Petitioner's Remedy Lies Before DRT Under Section 17.

16 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Mr. Suresh Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Corrigendum to Deemed Conveyance Orders in Co-operative Housing Society Dispute — Rectification After Five Years Held Barred by Limitation and Beyond Power to Correct Clerical Errors. The Court held that the Competent Authority under Section 5A of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 cannot modify substantive rights through a corrigendum after the order has been acted upon, and the application for rectification filed after five years is barred by limitation.

29 Jul 2024

The Petitioner, Prem Villa Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., challenged a Common Corrigendum/Order dated 14.01.2020 issued by the District Deputy Reg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Developer Removal in Slum Rehabilitation Case Due to Bias — Participation of CEO in Appellate Committee Violates Natural Justice. CEO who passed initial removal order cannot sit as member of High Power Committee hearing appeal against his own order under Slum Rehabilitation Authority regulations.

14 Aug 2012

The petitioner, Susme Builders Private Limited, a developer, was selected by the respondent Co-operative Society in 1986 for redevelopment of its prop...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Sales Tax Notices Against Axis Bank in Liquidation Proceeding — No Liability for Tax Deducted at Source Under MVAT Act After Company's Winding Up. The Court held that the State cannot recover tax from a secured creditor who had no obligation to deduct tax at source under Section 42 of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, as the deduction obligation arises only when payment is made to the dealer, and after winding up, the Official Liquidator is the proper authority.

7 Mar 2017

The petitioner, Axis Bank Ltd., a banking company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court s...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Merger Control Disclosure Obligations and Limits of CCI's Powers After Approval. The Court Emphasizes That CCI's Authority Must Be Traced to the Act and That Disclosure Must Present the Transaction in Substance.

1 Jan 1970

The case arises from an appeal under Section 53T of the Competition Act, 2002, filed by Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC before the Supreme Court...

52 53 54 55 56

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)