Search Results for "Master Service Agreement"

729 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 729 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Challenge to Termination and Pension Denial; Teacher Claims Protection Under Rule 47 and Exceptions for Absenteeism Period. Petitioner Contends Delay and Misapplication of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.

The writ petition arose from a long-standing dispute involving a school teacher's termination and pension claim. The petitioner was appointed as an As...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tata Memorial Centre's Petitions Challenging Industrial Court's Finding on Appropriate Government. State Government Held as Appropriate Government for Autonomous Body Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971, Making Union's Complaint Maintainable.

The Bombay High Court dismissed four writ petitions filed by Tata Memorial Centre (TMC) challenging decisions of the Industrial Court, Mumbai, which h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Revocation of Multi-System Operator Registrations for Non-Compliance with Rule 11(7) of the Cable Television Networks Rules, 1994. The Court found that the denial of security clearance was not communicated and no opportunity of hearing was afforded.

SCOD 18 Networking Pvt. Ltd. and Digi Cable Network (India) Pvt. Ltd., along with Digi Navi Mumbai Network Pvt. Ltd., filed writ petitions under Artic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Summons for Judgment in Summary Suit for Unpaid Freight Charges Due to Triable Issues. Oral assurance for credit period and freight prepaid arrangement creates disputed questions of fact requiring trial under Order 37 CPC.

The plaintiffs, IAL Logistics India, a freight forwarding company, filed a summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Procedural Order in Arbitration Proceeding. Section 9 or Section 19 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Cannot Be Invoked to Challenge Arbitrator's Communication Regarding Procedure.

The petitioner, Sahyadri Earthmovers, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 9 read with Section 19 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...