Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966"

678 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 678 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes BMC Demolition Order for Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioners' structure demolished without notice under Section 354 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, and court orders restoration.

The petitioners, occupiers of a plot of land in Jogeshwari, Mumbai, challenged an order dated 15 June 2023 passed by the Executive Engineer of the Bri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhanced from Rs.275-300 to Rs.500 per sq.m. Based on Comparable Sale Deed and Development Potential. Market Value Determined Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, with 20% Deduction for Development Charges.

The appellant, Nisar Ahmed Ramzan Momin, owned two plots of land in Village Nizampur, Bhiwandi, Thane, which were acquired by the State for a developm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in MRTP Act Case — Notice Under Section 53(1) Must Be Served on the Person Actually Using the Premises, Not the Owner Alone.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Amit Surendra Mittal (respondent) under Section 53(1) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State Appeal in Stamp Duty Dispute — Conveyance Deed Not Exempt Under Article 5(e) of Schedule I of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958. Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) by CIDCO to Developer Held Liable to Stamp Duty as Conveyance, Not as Instrument of Lease or License.

The case involves two Letters Patent Appeals filed by the State of Maharashtra and other stamp authorities against a common judgment of a learned Sing...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Rejects Challenge to Land Acquisition Award Under MRTP Act; Section 24(2) of New Land Acquisition Act Held Inapplicable. Acquisition Proceeding Saved by Section 114 of 2013 Act and Section 6 of General Clauses Act, Compensation Determined per Section 24(1)(a).

The petitioner, owner of land admeasuring 9 Gunthas of City Survey No. 3328 at Bhosari, challenged an acquisition award under the Maharashtra Regional...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch and Members Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act for Violation of Natural Justice. Orders Set Aside as Show-Cause Notice Did Not Specify Charges and Inquiry Was Conducted Without Giving Opportunity of Hearing.

The petitioners, who were members of the Gram Panchayat Karodi Sajapur including the Sarpanch and Up-Sarpanch, challenged the orders dated 6th Februar...