CONTEMPT PETITION NO.2 OF 2015
9 Feb 2016The petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of a direction in an order dated 21.10.2013, passed in Company Application (L) ...
Search Results for "Estate Administration"
868 result(s) found
Found 868 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Disposes of Multiple Writ Petitions Involving Slum Rehabilitation Authority — Relief Not Specified as Judgment Text Only Contains Cause Title and Advocates. The batch includes Writ Petition No. 3140 of 2019 and connected matters, with petitioners seeking various reliefs against the State of Maharashtra and the Slum Rehabilitation Authority.
30 Dec 2025The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, Division Bench) delivered a judgment on December 30, 2025, in a batch of...
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Disposes of Appeals and Revision in Kidnapping and Murder Case. Conviction under Sections 364-A, 302, 201, 120-B of IPC and Section 8 of Goa Children's Act, 2003, was Challenged by Accused, and State Appealed Against Set-Off under Section 428 CrPC.
4 Mar 2019The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard together five criminal appeals and one criminal revision application arising from the judgment and order dated 2...
- 28
High Court
WRIT PETITION NO. 5539 OF 2017
5 Feb 2019The petitioner, M/s. Veekaylal Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India in the Bombay High Court...
- 13
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction for Rescuing Accused and Causing Hurt to Customs Officers in Santhal Parganas. Sea Customs Act, 1878 Applicable to Scheduled Area Through Imports and Exports Control Act, 1947, and Inspectors Had Authority to Arrest and Seize Cloves as Prohibited Goods.
13 Nov 1969The matter arose from an incident on 13 December 1961 at Pakur Railway Station in the Santhal Parganas, Bihar. Nazir Mian, one of the appellants, was ...
- 10
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Priest's Appeal in Temple Mismanagement Case, Upholds Deity's Suit for Possession. Suit by Deity Against Person in Management for Mismanagement of Private Trust Not Barred by Section 92 CPC; Court Directs Framing of Scheme Under Order 41 Rule 33 CPC.
23 Jul 1969The suit was filed in 1947 by the deity Thakur Janki Ballabhji Maharaj, installed in a temple at Brindaban, Uttar Pradesh, acting through its manager ...
- 19
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Tax Authorities in Madras Urban Land Tax Act — Act Held Constitutionally Valid. Levy of 0.4% on Market Value of Urban Land Under Madras Urban Land Tax Act, 1966 Not Violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(f), and Retrospective Operation Reasonable.
11 Apr 1969The case concerned the constitutional validity of the Madras Urban Land Tax Act, 1966, which levied a tax on urban land at 0.4% of its market value. T...
- 23
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Company Law Board Order Dismissing Petition. Court Frames Questions on Applicability of Section 111A and Section 43A of Companies Act, 1956 to Deemed Public Company.
14 Jun 2011The appeal arose from a company petition filed by the appellants, members of the Kavasmaneck family, before the Company Law Board, Mumbai, alleging op...
- 10
High Court
High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad Hears and Reserves Order on Writ Petition by State Seeking to Quash KSAT Order Setting Aside Compulsory Retirement of Village Accountant in Bribery Case — State Contends KSAT Erred in Treating Acquittal in Criminal Case as Bar to Departmental Proceedings Despite Different Standards of Proof
25 Sep 2025The writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India was filed by the State Government through the Principal Secretary and the De...
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of IT Rules Amendment on Fake News in Reference Opinion — Rule 3(1)(b)(v) of IT Rules, 2021 Held Not Violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(a), 19(1)(g) of Constitution and Section 79 of IT Act, 2000.
20 Sep 2024The present proceedings arise from a reference made under Chapter-I Rule 7 of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 read with Section 98 of...
- 388
