Search Results for "trial near conclusion"

4027 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4027 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ganesh Mahadeo Yadav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Majalgaon, for the murder of his brother-in-law, Ravikiran, under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Abetment to Suicide Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Instigation. Conviction under Section 306 IPC Set Aside as Alleged Threat Did Not Constitute Abetment.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the conviction of the appellant under Section 306 IPC for abetment to suicide. The appellant was a former...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Consent — Conviction Under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Absence of Consent Beyond Reasonable Doubt

The appellant, Munja s/o Jijabhau Bhange, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani, for an offence punishable under Section 376 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence and Unreliable Hearsay Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ambaji @ Nana Hanmant Patil, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur for the murder of Ganpati Dattu Jadhav under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of two appellants, Maroti Shivram Nilekar and Shamrao Murlidhar Thuse, under Section 376(2)(g) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Reliability of Solitary Eyewitness in Murder Appeal; Conviction for Offence Punishable Under Section 302 Read with Section 149 IPC Challenged.

This criminal appeal arose from the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No. 846 of 2007, convicting the four a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellants' Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings That Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession. Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits Dismissed as Plaintiffs Did Not Discharge Burden of Proof Under Section 100 CPC.

The case involves two second appeals arising from a property dispute between the legal representatives of Balaji Ramaiya Manthanwar (appellants) and G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Robbery and Arms Act Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 392, 506 IPC and Sections 25(1A), 27(1) Arms Act set aside as sole eyewitness's testimony was inconsistent and no public witness was examined.

The appellant, Bhimaraya @ Bhimanna, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Yadgir in Sessions Case No. 06/2012 for offences punishable under Sections 3...