Search Results for "trade union possession"

590 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 590 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds CAT Order Reinstating Suspended Police Officer Due to Non-Review Under Rule 3(8) of All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969. Continued suspension beyond 90 days without mandatory review renders suspension illegal and without authority of law.

The State of Maharashtra and the Director General of Police filed a Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes COFEPOSA Detention Orders for Non-Application of Mind. Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Relevant Material and Relied on Irrelevant Grounds, Rendering Subjective Satisfaction Invalid.

The Bombay High Court delivered a common judgment in two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking writs of habeas c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Fraud Case Due to Non-Exhaustion of Alternative Remedies. High Court's Direction to Register FIR Without Prior Recourse to Statutory Remedies Held Illegal Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The Supreme Court considered appeals against an interim order of the Bombay High Court directing police to record the statement of the Director of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Non-Application of Mind and Unexplained Delay. Failure to Consider Retraction of Statement and Delay of Over 11 Months in Passing Order Vitiate Subjective Satisfaction Under Section 3(1)(i) of COFEPOSA Act, 1976.

The petitioner, Gaurav Kanak Jain, challenged a detention order dated 21st November 2016 passed under Section 3(1)(i) of the Conservation of Foreign E...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Examines Whether Writ Petition Against Minister’s Order Under APMC Act Must Be Filed Before Division Bench Due to Lack of Locus Standi of Petitioners. Petitioners Challenge Amalgamation Order Passed Without Jurisdiction Under Section 43 of Maharashtra APMC Act.

The matter arose from a dispute concerning the amalgamation of Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Motala with APMC, Malkapur. Petitioners, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State Government's Petitions Challenging Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Temporary Employees in Government Hospitals. Back Door Entry Without Selection Process Disqualifies Claim for Regularisation Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The State Government filed eight petitions challenging a common judgment of the Industrial Court, Satara, which had directed continuation of services ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Payment of Labour Court Award Under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Labour Court has power to award interest for period between date of award and actual payment to prevent miscarriage of justice.

The petitioner, Mrs. Prabhavati Ramgarib B., filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal and Labour Cour...