Search Results for "take notice"

16908 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 16908 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition Seeking Stay of Cancellation of Letter of Award in Tender Dispute. Court holds that disputes arising from pre-contractual stage are not arbitrable and interim relief under Section 9 cannot be granted when no arbitration agreement exists.

The Petitioner, Provident Multi-Trading Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim reli...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in MRTP Act Case — Notice Under Section 53(1) Challenged as Nullity for Shortfall in Statutory Period. Bar Under Section 149 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Does Not Apply When Notice Itself Is Invalid for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Period.

The appellant, Kishor S/o Ramalu @ Rambhau Telang, was the original plaintiff who received a notice dated 18.11.2010 under Section 53(1) of the Mahara...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Division Bench Hears Appeals Against Single Judge Order Quashing SARFAESI Auction Sale. Single Judge Had Canceled Sale Deed of Agricultural Land for Non-Compliance with Statutory Notice Requirements and Prohibition on Selling Agricultural Land under SARFAESI Act, 2002.

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by a borrower challenging the auction sale of his property under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in MRTP Act Case — Notice Under Section 53(1) Must Be Served on the Person Actually Using the Premises, Not the Owner Alone.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Amit Surendra Mittal (respondent) under Section 53(1) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Mutation Entries in Land Revenue Records, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Civil Courts. Petitioners failed to establish possession or title over suit lands; mutation entries held not conferring title under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The case involves multiple writ petitions filed by various petitioners challenging mutation entries made in the revenue records in favor of the origin...