Search Results for "recovery impermissible"

879 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 879 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders in Industrial Dispute — Petitioner Company Failed to Show Perversity or Jurisdictional Error in Awards Granting Relief to Workmen.

The petitioner, Electropneumatics And Hydraulics India Pvt. Ltd., filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging separate ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Section 143(2) Notice Issued Beyond Time Limit in Income Tax Reassessment — Notice Issued After Expiry of Statutory Period Under Section 149 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Is Invalid.

The petitioner, AMNS Khopoli Limited (formerly Uttam Galva Steels Limited), challenged a notice dated 31st May 2023 issued by the Assistant Commission...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Chandrakant Nivrutti Pagar, a Talathi, was convicted by the Special Judge (Anti Corruption), Nashik for offences under Sections 7, 13(1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Rejection of Application for Further Evidence in Cooperative Dispute. Court holds that once evidence is closed and arguments have commenced, reopening evidence at a belated stage is impermissible under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioner, Mr. Pralhad Chavatrao Lawand, filed three writ petitions challenging orders passed by the learned Judge, Cooperative Court, Solapur, r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Conditional Leave to Defend in Summary Suit for Recovery of Loan — Triable Issues Raised Regarding Limitation and Acknowledgment of Debt. Defendant's Application for Leave to Defend Allowed Subject to Deposit of 50% of Suit Amount Under Order XXXVII Rule 3(5) of CPC, 1908.

The plaintiffs, Carl Pinto De Andrade and others, filed a Commercial Summary Suit against Ventura Securities Limited for recovery of Rs. 1,00,00,000/-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reappointment of Superintendent in Gurudwara Board Case Due to Lack of Statutory Approval. Pay Fixation Set Aside as Contrary to Prescribed Pay Band Under Maharashtra Act No. XXV of 1956.

The petitioners, Sardar Surinder Singh and Sardar Ravinder Singh, members of the Sikh community, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 21....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Revoke Leave Under Clause 12 of Letters Patent in Mortgage Suit. Part of Cause of Action Arose Within Jurisdiction as Loan Agreement and Assignment Deed Were Executed in Mumbai and Title Deeds Deposited There.

The appellant, Deccan Chronicle Holdings Ltd., was the original First Defendant in a suit filed by PIL Industries Ltd. (the plaintiff) for recovery of...