Search Results for "processing costs"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "processing costs"

906 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 906 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Board Resolution in Canara Bank Dispute — Upholds Validity of Board Resolution Passed with Majority. Court holds that board resolutions passed by majority are valid and binding, and that the court cannot interfere with commercial decisions of the board under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

7 Oct 2025

The petitioner, M/s. Ray Projects Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a resolution passed by t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging GST Assessment Order for Violation of Natural Justice. Show Cause Notice and Assessment Order Found to be Based on Different Grounds, Causing Prejudice to Assessee.

17 Oct 2025

The Petitioner, West India Continental Oils Fats Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 2013, filed a writ petition under Article 22...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Aarey Colony Development as Forest Land — Held That Aarey Colony Is Not a Forest Under the Forest Conservation Act, 1980, and That the State Government Has Discretion to Use Land for Public Purposes. The court ruled that the dictionary meaning of 'forest' does not apply to Aarey Colony, and the petitioners failed to establish that it is a forest requiring prior approval under Section 2 of the Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

4 Oct 2019

The petitioners, Vanashakti (a public trust) and four individuals, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — No Grounds for Interference Established. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings Were Based on Evidence and Not Perverse, and the Petition Was Barred by Limitation.

3 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to set aside an arbitral ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Violation of Natural Justice and Public Policy. Failure to Provide Opportunity to Cross-Examine Key Witness and Non-Consideration of Vital Evidence Renders Award Patently Illegal.

3 Nov 2025

The appellant, M/s Leaf Bio-Tech Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the order of the Ci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows SICOM's Petitions Under Section 31(1)(aa) of SFC Act for Recovery of Term Loan Defaults. Financial Corporation Entitled to Enforcement of Security Interest Without Prior Adjudication of Liability.

25 Apr 2005

The petitioner, SICOM Limited, a deemed State Financial Corporation under Section 46 of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951, filed a group of pe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Pre-Deposit Condition for Appeal Under Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 — Section 21 Mandates Deposit of 75% of Debt Amount Before Entertaining Appeal. The Court declined to interfere with the Appellate Tribunal's order directing 50% deposit, as the order was within the Tribunal's discretion and the petitioners had an alternative remedy.

12 Aug 2005

The petitioners, Ashish Mines & Minerals and others, were borrowers who had availed credit facilities from the Central Bank of India in 1985, includin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Market Committee's Challenge to Exemption of Oil Mills from Marketing Fee. Minister's Order Exempting Mills from Payment of Fee and Supervision Charges Upheld as Valid Exercise of Power Under Section 12 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963.

17 Jun 2005

The Bombay Agricultural Produce Market Committee filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 8th December 1989 passed by the Minister for Co-oper...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Suit for Insurance Claim in Fire Policy Dispute - Insurer Liable for Loss of Hypothecated Goods Despite Alleged Breach of Condition. The court held that the insurer failed to prove that the machinery breakdown condition was breached or that it caused the fire, and the plaintiffs had insurable interest in the goods.

10 Apr 2006

The plaintiffs, M/s T.T. Blades (a partnership firm manufacturing razor blades) and a bank (plaintiff no.2), filed a suit for recovery of Rs.4,44,155 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Holding Retrenchment as Unfair Labour Practice. Non-compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act renders retrenchment illegal and amounts to unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

3 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Shekoba Auto Private Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, was engaged in the manufacture of automobile ignition...

51 52 53 54 55

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)