Search Results for "possession and enjoyment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "possession and enjoyment"

1313 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1313 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Transfer Order in Land Grabbing Case — Civil Court Retains Jurisdiction Over Title Suit. Section 20 of Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 Does Not Mandate Transfer of Suit Where No Land Grabbing Allegation is Made by Government.

14 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Joseph Saldhana, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 30.10.2018 passed by the 1st Additional Civil Judge, Mangaluru, in ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — Sale Deed by GPA Holder Without Authority Declared Void. Court holds that a General Power of Attorney must expressly authorize sale of immovable property and that the burden of proving authority lies on the party relying on the GPA.

30 May 2016

The case involves a regular first appeal filed by the defendants against the judgment and decree dated 24.02.2012 in O.S.No.2405/2010 passed by the XI...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Patna Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Advertisement Royalty Dispute — Distinguishes Royalty from Tax and Upholds Corporation's Power to Charge Royalty Based on Agreement. The Court held that royalty is a contractual consideration, not a tax, and does not require legislative sanction under Article 265 of the Constitution.

17 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court dealt with appeals by the Patna Municipal Corporation against a Division Bench judgment of the Patna High Court which had held that ...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Injunction Suit — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Possession and Title. Suit for permanent injunction dismissed as plaintiff failed to establish possession over suit property and did not seek declaration of title despite disputed ownership.

20 Jan 2025

The case involves a second appeal filed by the plaintiff, Rajaraman, against the concurrent judgments of the trial court and first appellate court dis...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Tribunal Order in Land Reforms Act Case — Upholds Grant of Occupancy Rights to Tenants Based on Consistent Evidence of Cultivation.

9 Jul 2019

The case involves two writ petitions filed by the petitioners (Yusuff Ali Khan and others) challenging the order dated 30.11.2007 passed by the Land T...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Mutation Orders in Favor of Daughter in Succession Dispute — Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title and Must Be Based on Possession or Legal Right. The court held that revenue authorities must consider actual possession and validity of documents before ordering mutation under the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.

14 Nov 2018

The petitioner, N.D. Vanamala, a widow, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnata...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Development Work in Specific Performance Suit Based on Oral Agreement — Interim Injunction Granted to Protect Plaintiff's Possession and Development Rights Pending Trial. The Court held that the Plaintiffs had made out a strong prima facie case for specific performance of an oral agreement for sale of an undivided share in immovable property, and the balance of convenience favoured granting interim relief to carry out development work.

11 Nov 2013

The Plaintiffs, Man Chandak Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance of an oral agreement entered into with late Shri Mangilal Gula...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition in Final Decree Proceedings — Mesne Profits Must Be Determined Before Auction Sale. Held that mesne profits under Section 2(12) CPC are a substantive right that cannot be deferred until after the sale of property in final decree proceedings.

10 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Sri S.P. Suresh, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders passed by the XV...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Land Acquisition for CIDCO Project, Upholds Validity of Acquisition Under 2013 Act. Court holds that acquisition under the 1894 Act had lapsed but was validly revived under the 2013 Act, and that the Court Receiver was not in possession at the time of taking over.

26 Nov 2024

The case involves three writ petitions concerning the acquisition of land bearing survey no. 59/8 at Village Asudgaon, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad,...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal for De-requisition of Lands Under Requisitioning Act — Compensation Already Determined and Property Not Released. The Court held that the appellants' remedy lies in seeking compensation enhancement, not de-requisition, as the property was not released within the statutory period under Section 6(1A) of the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952.

24 Nov 2020

The case involves an appeal by special leave against the Karnataka High Court's judgment dated 11.01.2008 in W.P. 8340/2006. The appellants, B.K. Ravi...

51 52 53 54 55

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)