Search Results for "notice under section 19(2)"

683 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 683 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows VIDC Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Compensation Reduced from Rs.2,00,000 to Rs.1,00,000 per Hectare. Market Value Determined Based on Sale Deed of Similar Land with 10% Deduction for Development Charges.

The case pertains to a land acquisition dispute where the Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation (VIDC) appealed against the enhancement of compe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Section 9 Petition Due to Pre-Existing Dispute and Section 10A Bar. Operational Creditor's Claim Time-Barred and Default Occurred During Prohibited Period Under IBC.

The appeal was filed by Royal Construction (Operational Creditor) against the order of the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, which dismisse...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Criminal Trespass in Land Dispute Case. Appellant Convicted Under Sections 302 and 447 IPC for Assaulting Deceased with Stick and Iron Rod Over Ancestral Property.

The appellant, Sudam Pandurang Sabale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, for the murder of his uncle Sharad Avadaji Sabale unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petition by BBMP Employees Challenging Promotion of Juniors Based on PUC Qualification. Senior Group D Employees Claim Discrimination as 2014 Clarification Exempted SSLC Holders from PUC Requirement for Promotion to Tax Inspector Posts.

The writ petition was filed by seventeen employees of Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) working as Group D employees, challenging a promotion ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Testamentary Suit for Letters of Administration; Will Not Validly Executed Due to Suspicious Circumstances and Undue Influence. Holograph Will Dated 20 March 1980 Not Proved Under Section 69 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872; Propounder Failed to Remove Suspicious Circumstances.

The testamentary suit originated from a petition filed by the son of the deceased seeking Letters of Administration with the Will dated 20 March 1980....