Search Results for "defendant's right"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "defendant's right"

5795 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5795 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Application for Decree of Possession Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC — No Clear Admission Found in Society's Letters. Admission Must Be Unambiguous and Unequivocal for Judgment on Admissions; Letters Merely Acknowledging Receipt of Documents Do Not Constitute Admission of Ownership.

5 Feb 2019

The plaintiff, Mahesh B. Chaudhary, filed a suit seeking possession of Flat No.17, 1st floor, Radha Sadan Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., and a dec...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Upheld. Sale Deed Cancellation Suit Fails as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Undue Influence or Fraud Under Section 16 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

18 Jan 2014

The appellant, Shivakumar, was the plaintiff in O.S.No.2108/2006 before the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Bangalore Rural District, seeking cancel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers GST Liability on Royalty Payments to Court Receiver in Commercial Property Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Payments to a Court Receiver Under Order XL CPC Constitute Taxable Supply Under the CGST Act, 2017 and Whether GST Should be Discharged via Reverse Charge Mechanism.

13 Sep 2019

The Bombay High Court, in a Court Receiver's Report arising from a commercial suit for recovery of possession of three shops used as a restaurant, exa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Flat Possession Case — Builders Failed to Prove Ownership of Land. Agreement to Sell and Power of Attorney Not Sufficient to Transfer Title Under Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

24 Jan 2005

The appellants, plaintiffs in the trial court, filed a suit for recovery of possession of 12 flats or in the alternative for recovery of possession of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Confirms That Lands Belonging to Defendant No. 5 Are Her Absolute Property Not Subject to Partition. The Court upholds the concurrent findings of the lower courts that the plaintiff failed to prove that the three disputed lands were ancestral joint family properties.

16 Apr 2014

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiff (now represented by legal heirs) against the judgment and decree of the Regular Civi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction in Property Dispute — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract. Agreement for Sale of Flat Declared Null and Void Due to Non-Compliance with Conditions Precedent and Lack of Valid Termination of Earlier Agreement.

21 Aug 2019

The plaintiff, Manohar Daulatram Ghansharamani, filed Suit No. 220 of 2013 in the Bombay High Court seeking specific performance of an agreement for s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title and Possession.

29 Oct 2015

The case involves a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arising from a suit for declaration of ownership and injunct...

High Court

High Court of Bombay examined the legality of referring a cable business dispute to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court considered whether the trial court correctly referred the dispute despite allegations of fraud and the contention that the arbitration clause did not cover the parties.

26 Jul 2013

The dispute arose between cable operators in Nagpur who had formed a consortium called 'City Cable Vision' (CCV) and entered into a Memorandum of Unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Co-owner Property Dispute — Holds That Possession of Co-owner Is Not Adverse Without Ouster. The court ruled that the burden of proving ouster lies on the party claiming adverse possession, and the suit for declaration and possession was within limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

29 Oct 2015

The case involves a property dispute among co-owners. The appellants (original plaintiffs) filed a suit for declaration of title and possession of agr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Limitation Plea in Suit Alleging Fraud and Late Delivery of Goods Shipped Under Bill of Lading. Defendants Seek Dismissal of Suit on Grounds of One-Year Limitation Period Under Article III(6) of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925.

24 Mar 2006

(1) Background: The plaintiff, a Korean company, entered into a contract with Indian exporters for the purchase of cold rolled steel sheets to be ship...

51 52 53 54 55

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)