Search Results for "contract enforcement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "contract enforcement"

1655 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1655 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Operational Creditor's Appeal in Insolvency Case Due to Limitation and Pre-existing Dispute. Application Under Section 9 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Barred as Cause of Action Accrued in 2011-2012 and Dispute Over Gas Supply Existed, Excluding Suspension Period Under Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 Not Applicable.

4 Jan 2023

The appeal arose from the dismissal of an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 by the National Company Law Tribunal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Secured Creditor's Priority Over Sales Tax Dues in MVAT Act Attachment Dispute. State Bank of India's mortgage charge on borrower's property held superior to VAT recovery under Section 32 of MVAT Act, 2002, following Central Bank of India v. State of Kerala ratio.

17 Dec 2020

The State Bank of India (SBI), a secured creditor, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the attachment of a propert...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Bank's Revision and Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case — Civil Suit Barred Under Section 34. Jurisdiction of Civil Court is Ousted When Secured Creditor Takes Action Under SARFAESI Act for Enforcement of Security Interest.

11 Feb 2011

The case involves a civil suit filed by Sagar and Saurabh Deshmukh (original plaintiffs) against their father Pramod Deshmukh, mother Vrunda Deshmukh,...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in SARFAESI Act Case — Civil Suit Not Barred Under Section 34 When Challenge is to Mortgage Validity and Bank's Actions, Not Recovery Proceedings. The court held that the bar under Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act does not apply to a suit seeking declaration of title and challenging the validity of a mortgage, as such issues are not within the jurisdiction of the Debt Recovery Tribunal.

16 Jul 2021

The appellant, Smt. Nanjamma, filed a civil suit (O.S.No.3780/2017) before the XXII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, seeking a dec...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Order in Execution Proceedings; Permits Power of Attorney Holder to Argue. Execution of Decree for Possession in Specific Performance Suit Involves Third Party Rights.

7 Oct 2005

This appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent read with Order XXI Rule 103 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenged the order of a learned...

High Court

Petitioner Challenges NCLT Order Admitted Under Section 7 IBC on Ground of Non-Pronouncement and Violation of NCLT Rules. High Court of Bombay Issues Rule and Hears Petition Alleging Order Non-Est for Lack of Pronouncement in Open Court.

29 Nov 2019

Not mentioned - judgment text incomplete...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case, Clarifying Jurisdiction Requirements Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court Held That Service of Section 21 Notice and Inclusion in Section 11 Application Are Not Prerequisites for Arbitral Tribunal to Exercise Jurisdiction Over a Person, and Impleadment is Based on Being Party to Arbitration Agreement.

17 Apr 2025

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 01.06.2012 between the appellant and respondent no. 1 to form a Limited Liability Partnership (respondent no...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Disclosure of Enquiry Committee Report Under RTI Act — Petitioner Entitled to Copy of Report as Denial Violates Right to Information Under Section 3 of RTI Act, 2005. Court Quashes Termination of Contract Based on Undisclosed Report and Directs Fresh Enquiry with Opportunity of Hearing.

3 Apr 2006

The petitioner, S.S.M. Arshad, an Indian inhabitant and businessman, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the B...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Tribunal's Failure to Consider Evidence — Claimants Entitled to Compensation Under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Court held that under Section 163A, the claimant need not prove negligence, and the Tribunal erred in dismissing the claim on the ground that the offending vehicle was not identified.

12 Jan 2026

The present appeal was filed by the original claimants, being the wife, major children, and parents of the deceased Shantilal Kalabhai Garasia, a Poli...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Arbitrator Appointment in ISRO Contract Dispute Due to Lack of Jurisdiction. Appointment by Delhi Arbitration Centre without consent of Union of India held invalid under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

22 Apr 2024

The petitioner, Union of India represented by the Ministry of Space (ISRO), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of In...

51 52 53 54 55

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)