Search Results for "arrest panchnama"

733 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 733 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Tax Superintendent in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Vijaykumar Marotrao Daiwalkar, was a Tax Superintendent in the Municipal Council, Chandrapur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction for Rape and House Trespass After Appellant Served Sentence. Conviction under Sections 451 and 376 IPC Upheld Based on Consistent Testimony of Victim and Medical Evidence.

The appellant, Yogesh Janardhan Shinde, was convicted by the 1st Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan, for offences under Sections 451 (house tresp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Robbery Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Recovery of Stolen Ornaments. The court found that the chain of circumstances, including last seen evidence and recovery of stolen property, was sufficient to sustain conviction under Sections 302 and 397 IPC.

The appellant, Mohan Maroti Jadhav, was convicted by the Sessions Court, Yavatmal, for the murder of Zimibai by strangulation and robbery of her silve...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistent Witness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ashok Muralidhar Jagtap, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his wife Shobha. The prosecution case was that on 5.1.20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Beersingh Jagatsingh, was convicted by the 8th Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Seweree, Bombay in Sessions Case No. 548 of 2006 for t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness testimony was contradictory and medical evidence inconsistent.

The appellant, Motanbai w/o Nathu Mahire, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Shahada in Sessions Case No. 36 of 1999 for the murder of he...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder Over Land Dispute — Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient. Brothers convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for killing neighbour; court finds motive, last seen, and recovery of weapon proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Anandrao Bapuso Patil and Vilas @ Balaso Bapuso Patil, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Sangli, for the murder of Bhanudas under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder by Burning Wife Alive on Suspicion of Infidelity. Dying Declarations Found Reliable Despite Minor Discrepancies, Conviction Under Section 302 IPC Confirmed.

The appellant, Nilkanth Laxman Koli, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his wife, Bharati, by pouring kerosene...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive — Life Imprisonment Confirmed. Court holds that motive, last seen evidence, and recovery of weapons at instance of accused establish guilt under Section 302 read with 34 IPC.

The appellants, Jivya Dharma Chothe and Lakshi Arjun Mirka, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Palghar, for the murder of Mahadu and cau...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Sub-Inspector and Private Individual in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole trap witness was a stock witness and evidence lacked corroboration.

The appellants, Jawansingh Ramsingh Gaud (a Sub-Inspector of Police) and Umesh Manohar Ambre (a private individual), were convicted by the Special Jud...