Search Results for "Rule 222"

674 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 674 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Trademark Infringement and Passing Off in 'MARINE' Mark Dispute. Plaintiff's registered trademarks for adhesives and sealants protected against defendant's use of identical mark for similar goods.

The plaintiff, Pidilite Industries Limited, filed a suit against Jubilant Agri & Consumer Products Limited alleging infringement of its registered tra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in MRTP Act Case — Notice Under Section 53(1) Challenged as Nullity for Shortfall in Statutory Period. Bar Under Section 149 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Does Not Apply When Notice Itself Is Invalid for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Period.

The appellant, Kishor S/o Ramalu @ Rambhau Telang, was the original plaintiff who received a notice dated 18.11.2010 under Section 53(1) of the Mahara...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Refer Parties to Arbitration in Commercial Dispute Over Unpaid Goods. Arbitration Clause in Purchase Orders Held Binding Despite Absence of Signed Agreement, as Parties Acted on Purchase Orders Containing Arbitration Clause.

The petitioners, Sai Wardha Power Ltd. and its directors, were original defendants in a civil suit filed by the respondent, M/s. Goyal Dhatu Udyog Pvt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Issues Interim Directions in Drunk Driving PIL Pending Appeal Against Acquittal of Actor. Court Notes Large Number of Recent Cases Under Section 185 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Directs Interim Measures.

This Public Interest Litigation (PIL) arises from an incident on 28 November 2002 in Mumbai, where the fourth respondent, a popular Hindi film star, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Measures. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Did Not Consider Whether Bail Conditions Could Adequately Prevent Petitioner's Dangerous Activities.

The petitioner, Deepak Suryawanshi, challenged a preventive detention order dated 11 July 2016 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Reduces Compensation by 50% in Motor Accident Claim Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased Driver. Deceased's failure to place warning signs after tyre puncture on highway contributed to accident, leading to apportionment of liability under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the legal heirs of Sunil Samharu Yadav, who died in a road accident on 19.05.2013. The deceased w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Directors for Alleged Failure to Furnish Information in Auditor's Report Under Section 217(5) of Companies Act, 1956 — Inordinate Delay of 5-7 Years in Issuing Show Cause Notice Held Unreasonable and an Abuse of Process.

The petitioners, who were directors of M/s Timblo Private Limited, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 5563 OF 2022

...