Search Results for "Project Affected Person"

1004 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1004 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Cross-Appeals Against Remand Order in Arbitration Matter — Power of Appellate Court Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Examined. The Court held that an appellate court under Section 37 cannot remand a Section 34 petition for fresh hearing but must decide the appeal on merits.

The dispute arose from a development agreement concerning a slum rehabilitation scheme in Mumbai. The appellant, Bombay Slum Redevelopment Corporation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Award Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Section 11A Held Inapplicable to Declarations Made Before Its Insertion, Award Not Invalid for Delay.

The petitioners, owners of land Survey No.129 Hissa No.2 at village Jambhe, challenged the validity of the Award dated 31st October, 1992, under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Municipal Councillors under Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act, 1965. The Minister's order was impugned on grounds of non-application of mind, lack of statutory violation, and absence of malafide intent.

The writ petition was filed by ten elected members of the Katol Municipal Council, including the President, ex-President, and councillors, challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Pune Municipal Corporation Resolution and Circular on Compounding Fees for Building Irregularities. Resolution Held Ultra Vires MRTP Act and BPMC Act as No Power to Levy Such Charges for Regularization Under Section 53(3).

The case involved three writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging a Resolution date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Due to 38-Year Delay and Laches. Consent terms entered by petitioner's father in 1966 binding on petitioner; possession taken in 1972; petition filed in 2010 without explanation.

The petitioner, Abhay V. Khinvasara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of land bearing ...