Search Results for "Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act"

874 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 874 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Interprets Scope of 'Child' under POCSO Act in Appeal Concerning Mentally Challenged Victim. Mental Age of Adult with Cerebral Palsy Considered for Applicability of Special Procedures under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

The case concerned a criminal appeal by the prosecutrix, a 38-year-old woman suffering from cerebral palsy (R. Hemiparesis), through her mother. An FI...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Issuance of Occupation Certificate for Committed Development Under UDCPR Regulation 5.1.3. Development Permission Granted Before Draft Regional Plan Publication Protects Builder's Right to Occupation Certificate Despite Subsequent Agricultural Reservation in Regional Plan.

The petitioner, Raj Realtors, a partnership firm, constructed ten buildings comprising 446 residential and 20 commercial units on land at Mouje Pashan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Demand for Tax Dues Prior to Acquisition Quashed Under IBC Provisions. Bombay High Court rules that tax dues from before the acquisition of a company under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) cannot be recovered from the buyer of the assets during liquidation proceedings.

The petitioner, sought to quash demand notices issued by the Gram Panchayat, Gowari, seeking recovery of outstanding tax dues pertaining to the period...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch Due to Insufficient Notice Period. Notice Period of 15 Days Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 Must Exclude Date of Notice and Date of Meeting.

The petitioner, Shaikh Jadanbee Shaikh Rais, was the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Garkheda-Jomala, Taluka Bhokardan, District Jalna. Respondent No.5, Sh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor Under POCSO Act — Age of Victim Determined by Ossification Test and School Records, Consent Irrelevant for Minor.

The appellant, Sujoy @ Sanjay Laltu Chakravarty, was convicted by the Special Judge, Gondia, in Special POCSO Case No. 11/2014 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. Court Holds That Removal of Sarpanch by No Confidence Motion Does Not Require Prior Notice or Opportunity of Hearing Under Section 55(2A) of the Act.

The petitioner, Bharat Vitthal Shete, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Pimpalgaon Khand. A no confidence motion was moved against him by respondent N...