Search Results for "Joint Executing Agreement"

719 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 719 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 4 OF 1986

The petition filed under sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, sought to challenge an interim award and certain directions issued by the so...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Unregistered Relinquishment Deed Invalid: Daughter’s Coparcenary Rights Upheld | Karnataka HC (RFA No.100096/2019, 2026)

The plaintiff filed a suit for partition and separate possession of her 1/5th share in ‘A’ and ‘B’ schedule properties, along ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tender Award by MHADA — No Violation of Natural Justice Found. Bidder's Challenge to Summary Rejection of Technical Bid Fails as Evaluation Was Based on Tender Conditions and No Prejudice Was Caused.

The petitioners, ACC India Private Limited and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad Considers Civil Application Seeking Recall of Compromise Decree in Second Appeal No. 356 of 2001. Applicant Claims Prior Purchase of Suit Land and Alleges Fraud, Suppression, and Violation of Interim Orders.

The applicant filed a civil application seeking recall of an order dated 23.12.2011 by which Second Appeal No.356 of 2001 was disposed of in terms of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Lok Adalat Award in Partition Suit for Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioners, who were entitled to 1/4th share each in joint family property, were not allotted any share in compromise decree passed without their consent.

The petitioners, Vajravathi and Roopa, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the award dated 13.04...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — No Patent Illegality Found. Claimant's claim for refund of margin money and compensation for unauthorized trades upheld as arbitrator's findings of fact are final under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a common arbitral award da...