Search Results for "1894"

1755 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1755 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Prisoners' Furlough Petitions — Imposition of Condition to Stay Outside District Held Invalid Under Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959. Competent Authority Cannot Impose Condition Not Contemplated by Rules; Orders Rejecting Furlough Set Aside.

The judgment concerns two criminal writ petitions filed by prisoners challenging orders rejecting their applications for furlough. The petitioners, Ra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Nominal Compensation of Rs.1 Set Aside. Market Value of Rs.6,417/sq.m. Awarded with Statutory Benefits Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellant, Sadashiv Madhav Shelke, owned land Survey No.3/27 bearing City Survey No.908 admeasuring 258.18 sq. meters at Shirdi, Maharashtra. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals for Enhancement of Land Acquisition Compensation — Market Value Fixed at Rs. 1,00,000 per Guntha. Reference Court's award of Rs. 60,000 per Guntha set aside as inadequate; court considers sale instances and potential value under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The judgment pertains to three first appeals filed by Dhondiram Tambe, Manohar Tambe, and Dagdu Tambe against the State of Maharashtra and other respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhances Compensation for Acquired Land. Market Value Determined Based on Comparable Sale Deeds and Potential for Development Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves a First Appeal filed by the Godawari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation and the State of Maharashtra against the judgment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Revision Applications Due to Delay Condonation and Enhanced Compensation Claims. The court held that delay in filing reference under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 should be condoned and matters remitted for fresh adjudication.

The judgment involves multiple civil revision applications filed by landowners whose lands were acquired for public purposes under the Land Acquisitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Appeals by Konkan Railway Corporation in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases. Court upholds Reference Court's award of compensation with 30% solatium and 9% additional amount under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves multiple first appeals filed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer (South Goa) and the Chief Engineer of Konkan Railway Corporatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Upholds Enhanced Compensation Under Section 28-A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court holds that reference under Section 28-A(3) is maintainable even if the original award was not challenged by the claimant.

The State of Goa, through the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Executive Engineer, filed a first appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisiti...