Search Results for "written statement delay"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "written statement delay"

3532 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3532 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order Setting Aside Abatement in Regular Appeal — Failure to File Application Within Limitation and Lack of Sufficient Cause for Delay Leads to Restoration of Abatement Order. The court held that the application to set aside abatement must be filed within the prescribed period of limitation under Order XXII Rule 4 CPC and Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and that the discretion to condone delay must be exercised judiciously.

25 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Smt. M. Girija, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 28.01.2021 passed by ...

High Court

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Condonation of 764 Days Delay in Filing Appeal Against Ex-Parte Decree. Defendant's Lack of Knowledge of Suit Proceedings Held Sufficient Cause Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

29 Jun 2016

The case arises from a civil revision application filed by the defendant (Nasirkhan Shamsher Khan) challenging the order of the lower appellate court ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Defendant in Eviction Suit Due to Misuse of Adjournments and Failure to Cross-Examine. Closure of Cross-Examination Right Upheld as Defendant Sought Repeated Adjournments Despite Last Opportunities and Costs, Violating Procedural Cooperation Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

20 Sep 2021

The Supreme Court dealt with a special leave petition challenging orders that closed the defendant's right to cross-examine the plaintiff's witness in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Industrial Court's Order Setting Aside Preliminary Issue Framing in Employee Status Dispute. The Industrial Court Correctly Held That the Question of Whether an Employee is an 'Employee' Under the MRTU & PULP Act Cannot Be Decided as a Preliminary Issue as It Involves Mixed Questions of Fact and Law.

10 Oct 2022

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (employer), challenged the judgment and order dated November 13, 2021 passed b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Decree Holder's Execution Petition and Dismisses Judgment Debtor's Challenge in Property Execution Dispute — Court Holds That Execution Proceedings Are Not Barred by Limitation When Decree Is Put into Execution Within 12 Years of Final Decree Under Article 136 of Limitation Act, 1963.

28 Mar 2019

The case involves two writ petitions arising out of execution proceedings. The decree holder, Dr. (Smt.) Jayashree Avinash Banait, obtained a decree a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Disability Accommodation Case Under RPwD Act 2016 - Appellant with Dysgraphia Denied Compensatory Time in NEET Exam Granted Relief. Court Upholds Statutory Rights to Reasonable Accommodation and Inclusive Education Under Sections 2(r) and 17(i) of Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, and Binding Nature of Examination Guidelines.

23 Nov 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 29 October 2021, which dismissed the appellant's writ petition under Article 226 of th...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Appellants' Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings Upheld Despite Suit Filed on Last Day of Limitation. The court held that delay in filing suit does not bar specific performance if plaintiff is ready and willing, and oral evidence to contradict written agreement is inadmissible under Section 92 of Evidence Act without pleading fraud or mistake.

17 Jul 2026

The appellants, defendants in a suit for specific performance, challenged the concurrent findings of the Trial Court and First Appellate Court which d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in SC/ST Atrocity Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Motive for False Implication. Casteist Abuse Allegation Fails as Prosecution Witnesses Contradict Each Other on Place and Nature of Abuses Under Section 3(1)(x) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

24 Mar 2017

The appellant, Smt. Usha Pandurang Tanpure, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, in Special Case No. 8 of 1998 for the offenc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Oral Agreement Not Proved. Plaintiff failed to establish oral agreement, payment of consideration, and suit was barred by limitation under Article 54 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

11 Feb 2020

The appellants (original defendant nos. 2 to 4) challenged the judgment and decree dated 18/02/2014 passed by the learned Judge, City Civil Court, Mum...

50 51 52 53 54

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)