KAHC010479002008_1
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a consolidated batch of writ petitions filed by various entities including National Mineral Development ...
Search Results for "single scheme"
4461 result(s) found
Found 4461 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging High Court's Regularization Order in Education Council Case. Division Bench's Reversal of Single Judge's Dismissal Upheld as Statutory Scheme Under Bihar Intermediate Education Council (Repeal) Act, 2007 Mandated Regularization Consideration for Long-Serving Employees.
10 Apr 2023The dispute originated from the regularization of employees who had worked for the Bihar Intermediate Education Council. The employees were initially ...
- 236
High Court
Gujarat High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Demolition Order Under Gujarat Town Planning Act — Upholds Eviction of Encroachers from Municipal Land. The Court held that the order under Section 68 of the Gujarat Town Planning and Urban Development Act, 1976 was valid and the appellants were not entitled to any further relief beyond the two-month period granted by the Single Judge.
20 Feb 2026The case involves an intra-court appeal filed by Saiyed Arefabanu Ibrahimbhai Miya and others against the judgment and order dated 23.12.2025 passed b...
- 66
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears Appeal Against High Court Ruling That Coal India Limited Lacked Authority to Notify Interim Coal Policy and Collect 20% Additional Price from Non-Core Linked Consumers. Appeal Challenges Finding That the Interim Coal Policy Dated 15.12.2006 Imposing a 20% Increase Over Notified Price for Linked Non-Core Sector Consumers Was Without Authority Under the Colliery Control Order Regime and Violative of Article 14.
1 Jan 1970This appeal before the Supreme Court of India arose from a judgment of the High Court at Calcutta dated 04.04.2012, which dismissed an appeal by Coal ...
High Court
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Clarifies Maintainability of Revision Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 — Interlocutory Procedural Orders Not Revisable. Division Bench Holds That Revision Under Section 34(4) is Limited to Orders Affecting Rights or Liabilities of Parties and Does Not Extend to Purely Procedural Orders Passed Under CPC.
21 Jan 2013The Bombay High Court was seized of three writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging orders passed by the Court of Small Causes ...
- 75
High Court
High Court Dismisses Writ Appeals by Appellant Challenging Land Acquisition for APMC Mega Market -- Acquisition Upheld Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Karnataka Amendment Act 33/1991
30 Jan 2026Appellant filed writ appeals against the dismissal of its writ petitions challenging land acquisition for an APMC Mega Market. The Trust owned lands i...
- 354
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Employer's Appeal Against Reinstatement of Workmen Under Industrial Dispute Act. Held that termination without complying with Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is illegal and workmen are entitled to reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages.
27 Sep 2019The case involves an appeal filed by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) and its officer against an order of a learned Single Judge of the Karnataka H...
- 56
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Whether GlaxoSmithKline Decision on Territorial Jurisdiction Stands Overruled by Supreme Court. Issue Pertains to Determination of Territorial Jurisdiction of Labour/Industrial Courts Under MRTU Act When Employees Are Posted Outside Maharashtra But Employer's Office Is Within State.
3 Nov 2025The High Court of Bombay heard a batch of matters comprising Appeal No. 585 of 2009 and several connected writ petitions. The core dispute centered on...
- 20
