Search Results for "section 34"

604 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 604 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in MSME Contract Dispute with Railways — Waiver of Section 12(5) Ineligibility Upheld. Petitioner's claim for additional wages dismissed as arbitrator's findings on facts and law were not patently illegal or against public policy.

The petitioner, M/s. Truly Pest Solution Private Limited, a Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise (MSME), was awarded a contract by the Central Railway f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Maritime Board Dispute Over Cargo Handling Charges. Court sets aside majority award directing payment at Rs.3 per metric tonne, remits matter for fresh consideration on applicability of 1995 or 1996 policy.

The Maharashtra Maritime Board (Claimant) filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging a m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Order to Pay Stamp Duty and Penalty Under Section 34 of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 — Held That Only the Person Who Executed or First Received the Instrument Can Be Directed to Pay Stamp Duty and Penalty

The petitioner, defendant No.3 in O.S.No.8/2010, challenged an interlocutory order dated 21.11.2013 passed by the trial court directing him to pay sta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Stamp Duty and Penalty on Unregistered Agreement of Sale in Specific Performance Suit. Trial Court Erred in Rejecting Application Under Section 37 Read with Section 34 of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957.

The petitioners, legal representatives of the original plaintiff Abdul Majeed, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute Over Defective Machinery. Claim Barred by Limitation as Arbitration Reference Made Beyond Three Years from Cause of Action Under Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The appellant, M/s. Premlaxmi & Co., placed an order with respondent No.1, Ingersoll Rand (India) Limited, for purchase of portable compressors. Four ...