Search Results for "procedural delay"

2009 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2009 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's SLP as Time-Barred Due to 663-Day Delay, Imposes Costs for Wasting Judicial Time. Government Inefficiency Not a Valid Ground for Condonation of Delay Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The Supreme Court dismissed a Special Leave Petition filed by the State of Madhya Pradesh as time-barred due to an inordinate delay of 663 days. The C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Consumer Forum Order for Lack of Jurisdiction and Limitation. Consumer Complaint Dismissed as Forum Lacked Territorial Jurisdiction and Complaint Was Filed Beyond Limitation Without Condonation Application.

The petitioner, Heena Mohammeddin Kashmiri, filed a Consumer Complaint No. MSDF/198/2008 before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Mumbai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay. The court held that a 34-day delay between the proposal and the detention order, without proper explanation, vitiates the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority under Section 3(1) of the MPDA Act.

The petitioner, Balaji Hanumant Pawar, challenged a detention order dated 10th March 2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Solapur under Section 3(1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay and Non-Application of Mind. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority failed to consider vital documents and exhibited casual approach.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Siraz Mohammed Sayyed, challenged a detention order dated 10 July 2015 passed under Sections 3(1)(ii) and 3(1)(i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging LARR Authority Orders Allowing Condonation of Delay and Amendment in Land Acquisition Reference. Procedural Flexibility Upheld Under Section 64 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 to Ensure Substantive Justice.

The petitioner, Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited, owned approximately 10 acres of land in Village Vikhroli, Mumbai, which was acquired by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appeal Dismissed: Court Upholds 10-Year Imprisonment for Sexual Assault of a Minor. The Bombay High Court affirms the conviction under IPC and POCSO Act, dismissing the appellant's claims of false implication and procedural lapses.

The Bombay High Court dismissed an appeal challenging a 10-year rigorous imprisonment sentence handed down by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging AAI's Refusal to Issue Revised NOC for Building Height in Slum Rehabilitation Project. Court Holds That Substantial Compliance with Procedural Requirements Suffices and That the Authorization Letter Dated 11 July 2016 Must Be Treated as Final NOC.

The petitioners, developers implementing a slum rehabilitation scheme in Chembur, Mumbai, sought a revised No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the Air...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of CISF Constable for Misconduct Under CISF Rules. Appellate Authority's Enhancement of Punishment from Reduction of Pay to Dismissal Held Valid as Judicial Review Limited to Checking Gross Disproportionality or Procedural Errors.

The dispute involved a constable in the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) who was found sleeping on duty and allegedly assaulted a senior offic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Order Directing Confirmation of Auction Sale Under Punjab Package Deal Properties (Disposal) Act, 1976. High Court's Intervention Justified as Financial Commissioner's Order Based on Conjectures Without Material Evidence Under Rule 8 of the Rules 1976.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh dated 13 August 2008, which set aside an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Manufacturer's Appeals in Central Excise Classification Dispute. Classification of Benzene and Toluene Based on Purity Under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and Procedural Compliance Under Central Excise Rules, 1944 Were Upheld by Tribunal.

The appeals arose from a common order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) concerning classification and duty demands on...