Search Results for "possession and enjoyment"

1313 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1313 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute Involving Sham Sale Deed and Adverse Possession. Court upholds concurrent findings that sale deed was nominal and plaintiffs had perfected title by adverse possession.

The case involves a property dispute over land in Kumarappanaickenpettai. The plaintiffs, sons and daughter of Nataraja Mudaliar, filed a suit for dec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Partially Allows Partition Appeal, Upholds 1/2 Share for Plaintiff but Sets Aside Mesne Profits Award. Co-owner in possession not liable for mesne profits without proof of ouster.

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 28.02.2018 in O.S.No.65 of 2009 on the file of the Fast Track Mahila Court, Dindigul. The plaintiff...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Injunction Suit — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Possession Over Suit Property. Court holds that in a suit for permanent injunction, the plaintiff must prove his possession on the date of filing and cannot rely on the weakness of the defendants' case.

The plaintiff, Rajaraman, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the defendants, Ravi and Sekar, claiming possession of a nanja land (suit prop...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Transfer Order in Land Grabbing Case — Civil Court Retains Jurisdiction Over Suit for Declaration and Injunction. Section 20 of Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 Does Not Mandate Transfer of Civil Suit Where No Allegation of Land Grabbing is Made in Plaint.

The petitioner, Joseph Saldhana, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 30.10.2018 passed by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Taxability of Interest Received on Enhanced Motor Accident Compensation. Petitioner Claims Interest is Capital Receipt and Not Taxable; Revenue Relies on Sections 56(2)(viii) and 145A(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, a 48-year-old man rendered paraplegic and bedridden since a road accident at age 8, filed a writ petition challenging the taxability o...