Search Results for "estoppel against statute"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "estoppel against statute"

524 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 524 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Interim Applications in Partnership Dispute — Parties Agree to Consent Terms for Capital Contribution and Interest Determination. The Court disposed of the applications as withdrawn, recording the consent order dated 18.01.2022 which required additional capital contributions and referral of interest disputes to the firm's Chartered Accountant.

14 Sep 2022

The present matter involves two Interim Applications (IA No. 3499 of 2022 and IA No. 3873 of 2021) filed by Prakash Balasaheb Chavan and Others (Appli...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Unauthorised Construction — No Right to Regularise Illegal Construction by Payment of Fees. The Court held that payment of development charges does not condone unauthorised construction under Sections 44 and 53 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

29 Aug 2019

The petitioner, Savitribai Phule Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, challenged a notice dated 9th March 2018 issued by the Solapur Municipal Corporation demand...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employee's Suit for Wrongful Termination - Acceptance of Severance Package Bars Challenge. Contract of Employment Not Specifically Enforceable Under Specific Relief Act, 1963.

15 Apr 2015

The plaintiff, Shanker Basu, was employed as head of corporate division of KBC Bank N.V. under a contract dated 19th June 2000. His services were term...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Age Limit for Promotion of Anganwadi Sevikas to Supervisors. Rule 7(1)(c) of Service Entry Rules, 2021, prescribing 45 years as maximum age for promotion, held not violative of Articles 14 and 16 of Constitution.

8 May 2026

The petitioners, ten Anganwadi Sevikas from Akola district, challenged Rule 7(1)(c) of the Service Entry Rules, 2021, which prescribed a maximum age l...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Orders in Kachchh District for Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Proper Notice Under Land Revenue Code. Orders Passed Without Hearing Petitioner Set Aside, Matter Remanded for Fresh Consideration.

18 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Kirit Mulji Shah, filed two Special Civil Applications under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging three orders passed ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Bombay High Court's Decision on Stamp Duty Refund for National Organic Chemical India Ltd. Maximum Cap on Stamp Duty a One-Time Payment, Rules Apex Court.

5 Apr 2024

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by the State of Maharashtra, upholding the Bombay High Court's decision that granted National Organic Che...

High Court

Madras High Court Delivers Common Judgment in Land Record Disputes. The Court Considers the Validity of Orders Passed by Revenue Authorities Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

20 Mar 2025

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Final Decree Proceedings — Non-Compliance with Preliminary Decree Directions Renders Final Decree Unsustainable. The court set aside the final decree in FDP No.9/2013 as the trial court failed to ensure compliance with the preliminary decree's directions regarding payment of owelty and costs before drawing the final decree.

16 Apr 2025

The appeal arises from a final decree in FDP No.9/2013 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Saundatti. The appellant, who was the 1st responden...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Labour Court Order for Retrenchment Compensation Under Section 33(c)(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Employer Liable Despite Nationalization and Transfer of Undertaking.

16 Jun 2011

The petitioner, Empress Mills (a unit of Maharashtra State Textile Corporation), challenged an order dated 14.12.1998 passed by the First Labour Court...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Denial of Promotion to Daily Wage Employees Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice. State Government's failure to promote daily wage Mazdoors to Karkun posts while promoting similarly situated employees violates Items 5 and 9 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

5 Jul 2006

The case involves three writ petitions filed by the State of Maharashtra and three others challenging a common judgment and order dated 9th March 1994...

50 51 52 53

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)