Search Results for "entertain"

5643 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5643 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Telecom Service Provider Jurisdiction - Section 7B of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 Does Not Bar Consumer Forums from Adjudicating Disputes with Private Service Providers Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The civil appeal originated from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 26 May 2016, which affirmed the juris...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellant's Appeal Against High Court's Jurisdiction Finding in GST Notification Challenge. High Court of Sikkim Lacked Territorial Jurisdiction as Cause of Action for Challenging Goa's GST Notification Arose in Goa, Not Sikkim, Under Article 226(2) of the Constitution.

The dispute originated from writ petitions filed before the High Court of Sikkim by a private limited company engaged in the lottery ticket business, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit for Clubbing Properties in Different Jurisdictions. Section 17 CPC Does Not Permit a Single Suit for Separate Immovable Properties Situated in Different States.

The appeal arose from a civil suit filed by the appellant (plaintiff) seeking declaration that two properties—one in Indore, Madhya Pradesh, and ano...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Water Dispute Case, Remands to High Court for Merits. Civil Court Has Jurisdiction Under Section 53 of Rajasthan Irrigation and Drainage Act, 1954 to Entertain Water Course Disputes, Subject to Restriction on Orders Affecting Growing Crops.

The dispute arose between Madan Lal (appellant) and private respondents regarding the use and distribution of water for irrigation. The matter was ini...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Lessee's Claim for Damages in Wild Life Sanctuary Case — No Right to Compensation Without Acquisition. Notification Under Section 18 of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 Does Not Confer Right to Damages for Loss of Use.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by M/s Natesan Agencies (Plantations), a partnership firm, against the judgment of the Madras High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Rejects Recusal Plea in Land Acquisition Reference. Judge Who Decided Smaller Bench Can Sit in Larger Bench to Reconsider Same Issue as Bias Plea Based on Extrajudicial Factors.

This order arises from a reference to a five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India concerning the interpretation of Section 24 of the...