Search Results for "arrest panchnama"

734 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 734 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Grievous Hurt Case Due to Unreliable Evidence. Material Contradictions in Testimony and Medical Evidence Fail to Prove Offences Under Sections 326, 504 read with 34 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 29.09.2000 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ajara, acquitting the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Section 4 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(i) IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim was a child below 18 years.

The appellant, Mahesh S/o Kundlik Dhavare, was convicted by the Special Judge, Osmanabad in Special (POCSO) Case No.26 of 2015 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Dacoity Case Due to Lack of Identification and Recovery. Identification of accused not established beyond reasonable doubt as test identification parade was not conducted and recovery of stolen articles was not proved.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, dated 4th August 1998, in Sessions Case No.33...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Devidas s/o Harichandra Bhaskar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon on 26-11-2015 in Special (A.C.B.) Case No.13 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor Girl in Neighbor's House — Victim's Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Offence Under Sections 376, 342, and 201 IPC.

The appellant, Vishnudas s/o Uddhao Bhagade, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Sections 376 (rape), 342 (wrongful co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Child Witness Testimony and Circumstantial Evidence. Five-year-old daughter's ocular evidence corroborated by overwhelming circumstances including extra-judicial confession and recovery of weapon.

The appellant, Dilip Dnyanoba Ghaware, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his wife, Savita, and sentenced to l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Tax Superintendent in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Vijaykumar Marotrao Daiwalkar, was a Tax Superintendent in the Municipal Council, Chandrapur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Ch...