Search Results for "Section 376 IPC"

1342 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1342 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Evidence Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Allegations.

The case involves three criminal appeals filed by appellants Pratik, Sudesh, Prithviraj, Munna, and Chhotu against their convictions by the Assistant ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support the prosecution case.

The appellants, Mangesh Vitthal Waghmare and Devidas Balchandra Rathod, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Washim, in Atrocity Case No. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Unreliable Prosecutrix Testimony and Lack of Medical Evidence. Conviction under Sections 376 and 506 IPC set aside as inconsistencies in evidence created reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Dattatray @ Kashinath Babaso Khatal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, for offences under Sections 376 (rape) and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration — Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Evidence Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Not Supporting Penetration.

The appellant, Shaikh Sheru s/o Shaikh Turab, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 376, 506 and 376 read with 511 of the India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant under POCSO Act for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault of Minor. Evidence of 13-year-old prosecutrix found credible and corroborated by medical evidence; sentence of ten years rigorous imprisonment upheld.

The appellant, Aaditya @ Sadanand Dilip Parab, was convicted by the Special Judge under POCSO Act, Greater Mumbai, for offences under Section 4 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Death Penalty for Accused in Rape and Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 376 IPC sustained as witness testimonies were trustworthy and chain of circumstances was complete, applying last seen theory and Section 106 Evidence Act.

The Supreme Court of India heard a criminal appeal by an accused convicted under Sections 302 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for the rape and...