Search Results for "Open spaces"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Open spaces"

534 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 534 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Demolition Order in Deemed License Case — Failure to Decide Application Within Time Results in Deemed Grant Under Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976. The Court held that the Corporation's inaction for over a year led to automatic grant of building license, and the demolition order without notice was illegal.

20 Dec 2021

The petitioner, a resident of Shimogga, owned a site and applied for a building license on 13.11.2020. The Corporation failed to decide the applicatio...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Daily 'Ahimsa Path' Until End of World War — Rejection of Indefinite Protest Permission Upheld as Reasonable Administrative Decision. The Court held that the right to peaceful assembly is not absolute and is subject to reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2) and (3) of the Constitution of India, and the police's refusal to permit an indefinite daily protest was not arbitrary.

24 Mar 2026

The petitioner, S. Prabhu, claiming to be the Union Secretary of 'Pathu Roobai Iyakkam', filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cooperative Society's Resolution to Demolish and Reconstruct Building — Petitioners Failed to Show Violation of Statutory Provisions or Bye-laws. The court held that the resolution passed by the requisite majority is binding on all members, including dissenting members, and no interference under Article 226 is warranted.

11 Apr 2018

The petitioners, who are partners of M/s. Remedios Brothers Brick Manufacturing Co., a partnership firm, filed a writ petition challenging a resolutio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Regularization of Unauthorized Buildings in Navi Mumbai — Section 52A MRTP Act Does Not Apply to Lands Acquired for Public Purpose and Belonging to Planning Authority. The court held that the compounding provision under Section 52A of the MRTP Act, 1966 is not applicable to unauthorized constructions on lands acquired for public purpose and vested in the Planning Authority.

14 Aug 2018

The petitioners were residents of buildings constructed without development permission on lands acquired by the State Government for the satellite cit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Direction to Reconsider Development Permission in MRTP Act Appeal — Minister Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 47 by Converting Appeal into Representation. The Court Held That the Minister Cannot Issue Directions Beyond the Scope of the Statutory Appeal and Must Decide the Appeal on Merits.

1 Nov 2018

The petitioner, Sunil Balakrushna Telang, owned plot nos. 11 and 12 in a private layout in Survey No.110, Village Ravet, within the Pimpri Chinchwad M...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Issues Comprehensive Directions for Release of Undertrial Prisoners in Suo Motu Public Interest Litigation — Systemic Overcrowding and Violation of Article 21 Rights Addressed. The Court held that the continued incarceration of undertrial prisoners beyond the maximum period of imprisonment for the offences they are charged with violates their fundamental rights under Article 21 of the Constitution, and issued directions to ensure their release and prevent overcrowding.

1 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court of India, in a writ petition filed by the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) under Article 32 of the Constitution, addressed ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Bank Recovery Suit Due to Failure to Prove Debt and Improper Service of Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court held that the plaintiff bank failed to prove the debt and liability of the defendant, and the notice under Section 138 was not properly served, thus the suit for recovery was not maintainable.

30 Aug 2019

The appellant, K. Ravindra Shetty, was the defendant in a suit filed by Vijaya Bank for recovery of Rs. 3,20,835.20 with interest. The bank claimed th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Decree for Partition and Separate Possession of Joint Family Property. The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove that the suit property was joint family property and that the defendant had established her claim of exclusive ownership through prior partition and settlement.

11 Nov 2019

The case involves a partition suit filed by Smt. Phulavati against her husband's relatives, claiming that the suit property was joint family property ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC where courts below have concurrently found that plaintiffs failed to prove title and possession.

15 Dec 2016

The appellants (plaintiffs) filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction in respect of certain immovable property. The trial court d...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Issues Directions to BBMP to Demolish Illegal Construction by Adjoining Landowner for Gross Violation of Building Bye-Laws. BBMP Officials Found to Have Failed in Statutory Duty to Inspect and Enforce Commencement Certificate Requirement Under Bangalore Mahanagara Palike Building Byelaws 2003 and Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act, 1976.

19 Nov 2014

Background: The petition was filed by the owner of property No.8/2, adjacent to respondents 4 and 5's property No.8/1 in Bangalore. The petitioner all...

50 51 52 53 54

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)