Search Results for "Limitation Act, 1908"

1872 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1872 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Reject Election Petition Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Court Finds Petition Discloses Cause of Action and Material Facts for Corrupt Practices Allegations Under Representation of People Act, 1951.

The proceeding arose from an election petition filed under the Representation of People Act, 1951, challenging the election of the returned candidate ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Unregistered Relinquishment Deed Invalid: Daughter’s Coparcenary Rights Upheld | Karnataka HC (RFA No.100096/2019, 2026)

The plaintiff filed a suit for partition and separate possession of her 1/5th share in ‘A’ and ‘B’ schedule properties, along ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revision Applications Against Rejection of Plaint Dismissal in Money Suit. Order VII Rule 11 CPC Application for Rejection of Plaint Dismissed as Plaint Disclosed Cause of Action and Was Not Barred by Law.

The case involves three civil revision applications filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging a common order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Mortgage Recovery Suit — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Transfer of Mortgage Rights Requires Proper Registration Under Section 17 of Registration Act, 1908.

The appellant, Milagres Sales Coutinho, filed a second appeal before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the judgment and order dated 22.06.2012 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Review Petition with 1495 Days Delay in Arbitration Appointment Case — No Sufficient Cause Shown for Inordinate Delay.

The present review petition was filed by Electronics & Controls Power Systems Private Limited under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Code ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Quashes Appellate Order Dismissing Eviction Suit, Holding Suit Not Barred by Limitation and Licensee Not Tenant, and Remands for Fresh Hearing. License Agreement Did Not Create Tenancy; Defendants Failed to Prove Protected Licensee Status Under Section 15A of Bombay Rent Act.

This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenged the judgment and order dated 25.06.2003 passed by the Appellate ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty for Unconsummated Transactions Under Section 49 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Petitioner's applications for refund were within limitation period and refusal by authorities was arbitrary.

The petitioner, Vilas Eknath Nandgude, filed six writ petitions challenging orders dated 31 December 2019 passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Re...