Search Results for "Family Courts Act, 1984"

1109 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1109 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction Overturned as Prosecution Failed to Establish Complete Chain of Circumstances and Comply with Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 in Recovery of Deceased's Body.

The appeal arose from a murder case where the appellant, Boby (accused No. 3), was convicted by the trial court and High Court for offences including ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Partition and Separate Possession of Half Share in Joint Family Properties Dismissed as Appellant Failed to Prove Substantial Question of Law.

The respondent-plaintiff filed a suit for partition and separate possession of her half share in the suit schedule properties against the appellant-de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Husband's Appeal in Matrimonial Dispute Over Possessory Rights to Shared Household. Wife's Claim for Right to Residence Under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Dismissed as Act Not in Force at Time of Filing.

The case involves two appeals filed by the husband challenging a common judgment and order dated 30.12.2004 passed by the Family Court No.4, Mumbai. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Death Penalty for Accused in Rape and Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 376 IPC sustained as witness testimonies were trustworthy and chain of circumstances was complete, applying last seen theory and Section 106 Evidence Act.

The Supreme Court of India heard a criminal appeal by an accused convicted under Sections 302 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for the rape and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows MTNL's Appeal Against Arbitration Order in Bond Dispute with Canara Bank. The Court held that arbitration proceedings cannot continue without a written arbitration agreement and without the consent of all necessary parties, specifically CANFINA.

The case involves a dispute between Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL) and Canara Bank regarding bonds issued by MTNL. In 1992, MTNL floated bonds ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Default Bail Computation Issue to Larger Bench Due to Conflicting Precedents. The Court Examines Whether Date of Remand is Included or Excluded in Calculating 60/90-Day Period Under Section 167(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for Entitlement to Default Bail.

The Supreme Court addressed a reference concerning the computation of the remand period for default bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal ...