Search Results for "Custody not required"

4549 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4549 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Quashes Direction to Expedite Extradition as Beyond Bail Jurisdiction. Court Finds Additional Sessions Judge Lacked Inherent Power to Order Return of Accused Under Extradition Act, 1962.

The applicant, the first informant in a criminal case, filed a criminal application before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under Sections 482 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Reservation for Sports Complex in Development Plan. Court upholds reservation of land for a multipurpose sports complex under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, rejecting claims of non-implementation and lack of public purpose.

The Bharatiya Adhyatmic Society, a public charitable trust, owned land in Chembur, Mumbai. The land was reserved for a 'Chembur Multipurpose Complex' ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Accused's Appeals Against Conviction under Sections 302, 307 Read with 34 IPC Arising from Property Dispute. Admissibility of Medical Certificate and Nature of Injuries Key to Determining Guilt.

The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard four criminal appeals filed by a father and his three sons challenging their conviction and sentence under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Army Offence Jurisdiction Dispute, Restoring Sessions Court Trial. Concurrent Jurisdiction Under Section 125 of Army Act, 1950 Upheld, with Commanding Officer's Discretion Exercised Through Cooperation with Civil Investigation.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Sikkim, which upheld an order of the Sessions Judge directing that the accused, an Army personne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Appeals Against Interim Injunction in Temple Pooja Rights Dispute. Appeals under Section 104 read with Order XLIII Rule 1(r) CPC challenge trial court's order restraining interference with hereditary archakas' rights at Shree Mahabaleshwara Temple.

The miscellaneous first appeals arose from a common order dated 2020-02-19 passed in Original Suit No. 2 of 2016 by the Principal District and Session...