Search Results for "Cooperative Court jurisdiction"

2272 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2272 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment in Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Alleging Res Judicata and Patent Illegality; Decision on Coercion and Interest Awaited.

The petition challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petitioner, a multi-state co-operative b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Partnership Retirement Dispute. The Court Examines Whether the Arbitrator Erred in Rejecting Petitioners' Claims and Imposing Costs Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Background: The dispute arose out of a partnership firm, M/s. Prospective Traders, constituted in 1977 by three family trusts. In 1985, the petitioner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Bank Peon Challenging Dismissal for Misappropriation. Misappropriation of Funds by a Bank Employee Constitutes Breach of Trust Warranting Dismissal, Even with Admission and Restitution.

The petitioner, Balasaheb Raghunath Bankar, was employed as a Peon with the respondent, The Rayat Sevak Cooperative Bank Ltd., from 2001. He was charg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints. Summary jurisdiction under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act does not bar determination of disputed employer-employee relationship when status is prima facie established.

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by Birla Cotsyn (India) Ltd., the employer, challenging identical orders passed by the Labour Court a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Consumer Forum Order Against Credit Society for Deficiency in Service. Fixed Deposit Holder is a Consumer Under Section 2(1) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The petitioners, including the Kala Hanuman Urban Credit Society and its directors, challenged an order dated 25 February 2009 passed by the District ...