Search Results for "Attendant Expenses"

549 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 549 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in NDPS Act Case for Smuggling Heroin in Suitcases. Circumstantial Evidence Including Possession of Keys, Baggage Tags, and Concealment of Contraband Sufficient to Prove Conscious Possession Under Section 21(c) of NDPS Act, 1985.

The appellant, Mrs. Agnes Ruddy Odhoch, a Kenyan national, was convicted by the Special Judge, Greater Mumbai, for offences under Sections 21(c), 23(c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Reverses Acquittal. Complainant Established Ingredients Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881; Accused Failed to Discharge Reverse Burden Under Section 139.

The appellant, Suresh Nakra, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act) against the respondent, Murugesan Ad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Probate of Will in Favor of Executor Despite Challenge by Caveator Claiming Earlier Will. Court Upholds Validity of Later Will Executed in Hospital, Finds No Suspicious Circumstances.

The case concerns a probate petition filed by Prakash Sunderdas Aswani, the sole executor named in the last Will of Pushpa Thakurdas Aswani dated 18th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rejects Plaint for Non-Compliance with Pre-Institution Mediation Under Section 12A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015. Suit Filed Without Urgent Interim Relief and Without Mandatory Mediation is Barred.

The defendant, Dipti Co-operative Housing Society Ltd, filed an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking reje...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits to Retired Bank Employee Despite Delay in Deposit of Contribution Amount Under Joint Note Dated 27 April 2010. The court held that the three-day period for deposit was unreasonable and that the petitioner's substantial compliance warranted granting pension.

The petitioner, Ramesh Gajanan Nigudkar, joined the Bank of Baroda as a subordinate staff member on 4 March 1967 and retired after 39 years of unblemi...