Search Results for "Alternative Access"

687 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 687 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay, Non-Consideration of Bail Order, and Violation of Article 22(5). Detaining Authority Failed to Communicate Representation Decision and Consider Bail Order; Violated Petitioner's Constitutional Right.

The case pertained to a writ of habeas corpus filed by the detenu challenging a preventive detention order under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangero...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Company Law Board Order Dismissing Petition. Court Frames Questions on Applicability of Section 111A and Section 43A of Companies Act, 1956 to Deemed Public Company.

The appeal arose from a company petition filed by the appellants, members of the Kavasmaneck family, before the Company Law Board, Mumbai, alleging op...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Hears Regular First Appeals Against Dismissal of Suits on Admissions Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC in Family Partition Dispute. Appeals Arise from Dispute Over Family Arrangement Documents and Partition of Ancestral Agricultural Lands.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru delivered a common judgment in two regular first appeals filed by the same appellant, M.R. Raghuram, against ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court heard criminal appeal against conviction under Section 302 Indian Penal Code. Appeal challenged reliance on last seen together, confession under Section 164 CrPC, and diary evidence in proving murder of mother-in-law.

The appeal was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad against the judgment and order of conviction passed by the Add...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Order. Court upholds validity of suo-motu sanction under Section 45(2) of UAPA and cognizance order under Section 120B IPC read with UAPA and CLA Act.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Telecom Company in Industrial Dispute, Holding Regional Business Head Not a 'Workman' Under Industrial Disputes Act. Managerial and Supervisory Duties Exclude Employee from Section 2(s) Definition Despite Absence of Power to Appoint or Dismiss.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s Bharti Airtel Limited against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court which had held that the respo...