Search Results for "wrong rule"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "wrong rule"

4974 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4974 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Challenging Rejection of Discharge in MCOCA Case. Appeal Raises Issues on Requirement of Pecuniary Benefit and Validity of Approval and Sanction under MCOCA, 1999.

7 May 2010

The matter arises from Criminal Appeal No. 930 of 2009 filed before the Bombay High Court under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Control of Organized Cri...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by State Bank of India in Jet Airways Insolvency Case — Holds Performance Bank Guarantee Cannot Be Adjusted Against Resolution Plan Payment and Non-Implementation Leads to Liquidation. The Court ruled that the SRA's failure to pay airport dues and employee dues constituted non-implementation of the Resolution Plan under Section 33(3) IBC, 2016, and the PBG cannot be set off against the first tranche payment.

13 Nov 2024

The case pertains to the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of Jet Airways (India) Limited, initiated by State Bank of India (SBI) under S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Date of Birth Correction in School Record Due to Delay and Lack of Evidence. Petitioner sought correction after 30 years of service, but court held that belated application without contemporaneous evidence cannot be entertained under Article 226.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Azam Khan Pathan, was working as an Administrative Officer in Pratishthan Mahavidyalaya, Paithan, and was due for retirement within 7-...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Condonation of Delay in Appeal Against Ex-Parte Decree — Pendency of Application to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree Not Sufficient Cause Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963. The court held that proceedings to set aside an ex-parte decree do not constitute sufficient cause for condoning delay in filing an appeal against the decree.

20 Aug 2014

The petitioners, original plaintiffs in a partition suit, obtained an ex-parte decree in Regular Civil Suit No. 35 of 2007. The respondents (defendant...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Reopening of Partition Permitted Due to Non-Inclusion of Joint Family Property. The Court held that a prior partition decree not binding on the plaintiff as she was not a party and the property was joint family property.

9 Oct 2017

The appellant, Monakka Shinde, filed a suit (O.S. 370/2004) for reopening of partition, declaration, and injunction against her sons, Maruti Shinde an...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Raman & Raman Ltd. in Stage Carriage Permit Matter, Quashing Appellate Authority's Order. Section 43A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, Holds Only Administrative Power; Directions Issued Are Not Law and Cannot Affect Prior Permits.

18 Feb 1959

The appellant, M/s. Raman & Raman Ltd., was one of several applicants for a stage carriage permit. The Regional Transport Authority granted the permit...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition on Removal from TPE Caution List: Alleged Violation of Natural Justice and Procedural Guidelines. Court Reserves Orders after Considering Petitioner's Grievance Regarding Inclusion in Caution List Without Proper Forum Evaluation.

24 Feb 2026

The petitioner, a chartered engineer and government-approved valuer, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India see...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Employer's Appeal and Sets Aside Tribunal's Award in Retrenchment Case – Managerial Decision to Reorganise Business and Retrench Employees Held Bona Fide; Tribunal Cannot Question Propriety. Retrenchment in Compliance with Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 25F and West Bengal Industrial Disputes Rules, 1958 Rule 77(1); Error of Tribunal in Ignoring Bona Fide Nature of Decision Corrected via Certiorari.

27 Nov 1968

The dispute arose from the retrenchment of employees by Parry & Co. Ltd. following a policy decision to reorganise its business by emphasising manufac...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Government Order Handing Over Mahabaleshwara Temple to Ramachandrapura Mutt. The Court Examines Validity of Revenue Department's Order Under Bombay Public Trust Act and Constitutional Provisions.

10 Aug 2018

The matter involved a batch of writ petitions and writ appeals filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, including Writ Petition No.30609...

High Court

KAHC010085932008_1

10 Aug 2018

...

49 50 51 52 53

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)